Glucose
Monitoring for Effective Therapy of Diabetes in
Office Medical Practice
.........................................................................................................................
Ali A. Rizvi, MD, FACP
Diabetes Unit Division of Endocrinology,
Diabetes, and Metabolism
University of South Carolina School of Medicine
Two Medical Park, Suite 502 Columbia, South
Carolina 29203, USA
Ph: 803-540-1071 Fax: 803-540-1050 email: arizvi@gw.mp.sc.edu
.........................................................................................................................
|
ABSTRACT
Diabetes mellitus
is a chronic, costly, and increasingly
prevalent disorder that carries a huge
burden of complications. Blood glucose
monitoring is critical to achieving glycemic
goals and standards of care. An integral
part is self-monitoring with glucose meters
that are user-friendly and accurate while
minimizing patient discomfort. Minimally
invasive continuous monitoring is available
for physician-directed retrospective review
of 3 days of data, while a subcutaneous
sensor that transmits frequent readings
to be viewed on the screen of an insulin
pump in real time has recently been launched.
Graphs and trends of blood glucose with
the help of software that analyzes and
reports them through meter downloads and
sophisticated data management features
provide valuable feedback regarding the
state of glycemia. The development of
completely noninvasive blood glucose monitoring
promises to aid in configuring a 'closed-loop'
system that delivers insulin in a semi-automated
fashion. Ongoing research and its translation
to the bedside through the proper education
and training of both clinicians and patients
will be the key to successfully harnessing
these exciting technological advances
for optimizing diabetes care in the future.
|
Key words: diabetes, glucose monitoring,
glucose meters, continuous monitoring
.........................................................................................................................
The prevalence of diabetes
has witnessed a relentless increase in modern
times, accompanied by its enormous toll in complications
and cost [1]. Attainment of optimal glucose
targets by monitoring of daily, monthly, and
long-term glycemic control is an integral part
of an effective strategy to improve diabetes
management. The field has witnessed remarkable
advances in the ease and accuracy of glucose
monitoring techniques recently in order to assist
in improving diabetes management. The American
Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of care
[2] include parameters pertaining to both self-monitored
blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
(Table 1). This provides valuable feedback on
the effectiveness of treatment and guides the
clinician and patient in making appropriate
daily and long-term adjustments with the ultimate
aim of sustaining optimal glycemic control.
|
SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE (SMBG) |
Recent research that points
to glycemic variability as a risk factor for
endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and
vascular complications independent of the HbA1c
level [3]. The new paradigm is to aim for blood
glucose concentrations in persons with diabetes
as close to those found in non-diabetic individuals
as is safely possible. The frequency and timing
of SMBG should be dictated by the particular
circumstances, needs and goals of the patient.
The ADA's Consensus Statement [4] list the following
indications for SMBG: (a) achieving and maintaining
glycemic control (b) preventing and detecting
severe hypoglycemia (c) avoiding and treating
episodes of significant hyperglycemia (d) adjusting
to changes in lifestyle, and (e) determining
the need for initiating insulin therapy in gestational
diabetes mellitus. SMBG allows patients to evaluate
their individual response to therapy, assess
whether glycemic targets are being achieved,
and can be useful in preventing hypoglycemia
and adjusting medication doses. This becomes
crucial when intensive insulin regimens with
multiple-dose injections or pump therapy are
employed.
Clinical studies reveal that
SMBG is performed by patients much less frequently
than recommended [5]. For type 1 patients, SMBG
is recommended three or more times a day, especially
when tight control is the aim [4]. The optimal
frequency of SMBG for patients with type 2 diabetes
on oral agents should be sufficient to facilitate
reaching glucose goals; twice daily or more
frequent monitoring may be desirable in patients
treated with sulfonylureas, other secretagogues,
or insulin, particularly when therapy is initiated
or changed [4]. To achieve postprandial glucose
targets, SMBG 2 hours after meals (one hour
post-meal in gestational diabetes) is appropriate
[6]. Routine evaluation of the patient's technique
and ability to use data to adjust therapy is
recommended.
Accurate and user-friendly
meters for home use provide the autonomy and
flexibility of checking glucose levels with
minimum hassle and discomfort. The worldwide
market for glucose monitors is $2.7 billion
per year, with annual growth estimated at 10-12%
[7]. At least 25 different meters are commercially
available [8]; however, a large variability
in their performance exists because many factors
can interfere with glucose analysis. Only half
of all analyses meet the ADA criterion of <5%
deviation from reference values [9].
The accuracy of SMBG is both
instrument- and user-dependent. Several technologic
advances that decrease operator error in the
last few years include "no touch"
technique, "no wipe" strips, timing
when both the sample and the strip are in the
meter, smaller sample volume requirements, an
error signal if sample volume is inadequate,
barcode readers, and the ability to store up
to several hundred results in memory. Together
these improvements have led to superior performance
by new meters. Patients should be instructed
in the correct use of glucose meters and their
monitoring technique evaluated at regular intervals
[10]. Optimal use of SMBG also requires proper
interpretation of the data. Patients should
be taught how to use the information to adjust
food intake, exercise, or pharmacological therapy
to achieve specific glycemic goals. Ongoing
education at clinic visits, comparison of SMBG
with concurrent laboratory glucose analysis,
and home practice with meters improves the accuracy
of patients' blood glucose results [11].
Alternate site testing (AST)
may be useful in reducing the number of fingertip
tests, reduce discomfort, and enhance the acceptability
of self-monitoring in patients who check several
times a day [12]. Not all glucose meters are
approved for AST, although this feature is rapidly
becoming a standard feature in most meters.
The forearm is the usual site for AST and has
been studied the most. The Advance Micro-draw
System (Hypoguard USA, Inc.) received clearance
from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
for drawing a blood sample from the palm for
measuring blood glucose, which may be a less
painful site for testing than, but correlates
well with, the fingertips. Studies show good
correlation of forearm readings with results
from fingertip checks in the fasting state.
After meals, however, the fingertip readings
tend to be higher than the forearm, where blood
flow is slower. The fingertip is the recommended
place for testing when accuracy is important,
as in suspected hypo- or hyperglycemic situations.
AST in the hypoglycemic range may potentially
give misleading results.
Monitoring times merit comment
(Table 2). Pre-meal measurements are needed
to adjust the basal insulin dose and in determining
the dose of short-acting insulin prior to meals
in patients who use multiple-dose, flexible
insulin regimens. Two-hour post-prandial readings
are important to assess the level of post-meal
hyperglycemia, and serve as a verification of
meal coverage when a short-acting oral secretagogue
or rapid-acting insulin is used. After fine-tuning
of the insulin dose at mealtimes has been achieved,
post-prandial monitoring should continue to
be performed periodically but less frequently.
The bedtime check is helpful in determining
the efficacy of the dinnertime dose of insulin,
and as a key safety component in preventing
nocturnal hypoglycemia. A blood glucose test
between 2 to 4 am once or twice a week can identify
episodes of unrecognized nocturnal or overnight
hyper- or hypoglycemia and is an important part
of adjusting long-acting insulin dosage or the
basal insulin rate during pump therapy. Importantly,
blood glucose should be checked if symptoms
of hypoglycemia are present, illnesses that
can affect glucose control are present, and
prior to driving and physical activity.
In spite of the availability
of meter memory and download capabilities, maintaining
a written log of blood glucose readings is very
important. This enables the patient and the
provider to look at various relevant parameters
(like notes on food intake and timing, activity,
stress, etc.), as well as trends of the readings
over many days, weeks, or months, in order to
facilitate necessary therapeutic adjustments
(Figure 1).
The choice of a meter is
influenced by patient preference, cost, insurance
coverage, and physician recommendations. Certain
unique meter characteristics may lend themselves
to preferred usage by a particular patient.
For example, meters may have a user-friendly
design, single-strip system with no coding or
calibration requirements, require a small blood
sample size, have a quick 5-second result time,
provide the option of alternate-site (forearm)
testing, have electronic logbook or data download
capabilities, show trend graphs on the screen,
send glucose readings automatically to an insulin
pump, or be able to organize readings into before-meal
and after meal times for showing relationship
of glucose to food intake. Certain 'talking"
meters providing audible glucose reports, while
voice-prompts can guide the visually-impaired
step-by-step through the testing sequence.
|
METER MEMORY AND DATA
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
The capability of storing blood glucose values
that can be accessed by scrolling back is a
convenient feature of many glucose meters. However,
even though the readings give dates and times,
it is difficult to assess a pattern and make
appropriate treatment changes based on the scroll-back
memory feature alone. Downloading data into
a computerized database far pattern analysis
and long-term storage is intended to circumvent
this hurdle. These data management systems can
store hundreds of test results and information
such as time, date, insulin or medication types
and doses, meals, and exercise times. Different
time-segments can be designated as 'fasting',
'pre-meal', or 'postprandial' and the computer
will group the readings into these categories
for ease of analysis. It may be helpful to display
or observe the SMBG results in one of the various
graph or text formats or as a14-day summary
provided by these computer software systems
(Figure 2). Some blood glucose meters also have
the capability of built-in data analysis and
can display glucose averages, day graphs, and
other helpful patterns; patients can detect
trends in glycemic values and thus participate
more actively in their own care. The MiniMed
Solutions Software (Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge,
California, USA) can integrate blood glucose
values from the Paradigm Link meter with various
parameters of insulin pump therapy - like amount
of carbohydrates consumed and boluses of insulin
given by the patient - thus assisting in fine-tuning
of pump settings.
|
MINIMALLY INVASIVE
CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING (CGM) |
Despite the phenomenal advances in blood glucose
meter technology, self-monitoring as it currently
exists has real and inherent limitations. Fingerstick
testing shows a snapshot of the glucose level
at a single point in time, representing the
sporadic measurement of a continuous and changing
variable. It does not give an idea of the degree
and direction of change in glucose. With more
frequent or continuous monitoring, information
can be used to adjust treatments in a more measured,
anticipatory, and meaningful manner, thus safely
intensifying control [13]. The downsides include
having to learn, navigate, and troubleshoot
the new devices, the need for educating providers
and patients, increased cost, "information
overload", and the imperfections of the
nascent technology itself.
The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Gold
(Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) has the
advantage of providing very frequent glucose
readings - up to one every 5 minutes or 288
readings a day for 3 days at a time. A tiny
sensor is inserted just beneath the skin of
the abdomen for 'continuous' recordings that
can be downloaded and retrospectively analyzed.
Patients can note events like insulin administration,
meals, and exercise times. It can be helpful
in giving the clinician a more 'complete' picture
and pick up unsuspected periods of glucose peaks
and lows, uncover nocturnal hypoglycemia, detect
hypoglycemia unawareness, and show glycemic
elevations as in the post-prandial state or
the dawn phenomenon [14] (figure 3). The Guardian
RT can sound an auditory or vibratory alarm
for both hypo- and hyperglycemia in real-time
according to a preset glucose range [15]. The
increased realization and emphasis on the benefits
of tight glycemic control in hospital patients,
especially in critical care, the peri-operative
period, and cardiac bypass surgery, has spurred
the development of continuous blood glucose
recording in the inpatient setting [16] although
none are approved or available for clinical
use yet.
The MiniMed Paradigm REAL-Time System (Medtronic
Minimed, Northridge, California, USA), which
consists of two components: a continuous glucose
monitoring system and an insulin pump (figure
4). A sensor, inserted under the skin by the
patient and replaced every three days, measures
interstitial fluid glucose. A recent advancement
is the MiniLink sensor that is smaller and runs
on rechargeable batteries. A transmitter then
sends this information to an insulin pump (the
Paradigm 522 or 722 brands) where it is displayed
on the screen as a real-time glucose value as
well as 3-hour and 24-hour trend graphs. The
device can be programmed to trigger an alarm
for readings outside the desirable range - both
hyper- and hypoglycemia - that can be confirmed
by a fingerstick test. Glucose trends can be
spotted and anticipatory steps taken in order
to prevent glycemic excursions. It is hoped
that this 'sensor-augmented' insulin pump may
prove to be a prelude to completely noninvasive
glucose sensing coupled with automatic insulin
delivery - a closed-loop system that may function
as a true 'artificial pancreas'.
The DexCom STS (DexCom Inc, San Diego, California,
USA) is a patient-insertable sensor that transmits
blood glucose readings wirelessly to a hand-held
receiver. A long-term sensor (LTS) is available
for subcutaneous implantation as an outpatient
procedure under local anesthesia.
|
TESTS OF AVERAGE GLYCEMIA |
The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test enables health
providers to ascertain a patient's average glycemia
over the preceding 2-3 months and thus assess
treatment efficacy. It should be performed routinely
in all patients with diabetes in order to document
the degree of glycemic control at initial assessment
and subsequently as part of continuing care.
It is recommended that the HbA1c test be done
at least two times a year in patients who are
meeting treatment goals (and who have stable
glycemic control) and quarterly in patients
whose therapy has changed or who are not meeting
glycemic goals [2]. Note that glycemic control
is best judged by the combination of the results
of the patient's SMBG testing and the HbA1c;
the two complement each other. Point-of-care
HbA1c testing with rapid turn-around in the
office has been shown to be effective in making
interventions, changing therapies, and improving
general management strategy immediately in the
ambulatory setting [17]. Physician-patient discussions
regarding treatment changes can be done face-to-face
and more efficiently without an unnecessary
delay in instituting adjustments (figure 5).
Several home HbA1c test kits, most requiring
mail-in for results, are also available.
Due to its shorter half-life, glycated serum
fructosamine provides an index of glycemic control
over the preceding 10-14 days. This test gives
two-week averages of blood glucose by measuring
the glycosylation of the blood proteins albumin
and globulin, and thus provides a clue to recent,
short-term glycemic control [18]. This test
may be useful during pregnancies, in the presence
of hemoglobinopathies and hemolytic anemias,
and for the short-term evaluation of therapeutic
interventions.
GlycoMark is an FDA-approved blood glucose
testing system that is purported to bridge the
gap between fingerstick monitoring and HbA1c
by measuring levels of the compound 1,5-anhydroglucitol.
It is marketed as a test of short-term to intermediate
glycemic control, reflecting predominantly post-meal
glucose excursions [19]. As an index of postprandial
hyperglycemia, GlycoMark should prove useful
as treatment targets are lowered and management
of post-meal glucose spikes becomes increasingly
important.
|
WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS:
NONINVASIVE CONTINUOUS MONITORING |
The science of glucose monitoring has seen
vast improvement s in the past decade, helping
patients and providers to implement intensive
control with the promise of reducing the burden
of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality.
It is hoped that the next breakthrough in this
area will be the advent of completely noninvasive
testing that is risk-free, accurate, convenient,
and affordable. In addition, for insulin-treated
patients, a feedback system based on the latest
monitoring technology to calculate and automatically
deliver the appropriate amounts of insulin will
be a major and exciting therapeutic advancement.
Maintaining excellent glycemic control through
minimizing day-to-day glucose variations seems
to be the standard of care for diabetes management
for the future. With the current state and pace
of technological progress, this goal appears
more achievable than ever before.
|
TABLE 1. Summary
of recommendations for adults with diabetes
|
|
TABLE 2. Recommended
times for Self Monitoring of Blood Glucose
(SMBG). |
|
|
Reading Time
|
Rationale
|
|
1.
|
morning or pre-breakfast
|
adjust basal therapy
|
|
2.
|
before meals
|
calculate bolus insulin
|
|
3.
|
bedtime
|
adequacy of dinner treatment and nocturnal
safety feature
|
|
4.
|
90-120 minute post-prandial
|
assess post-meal glycemic elevations
|
|
5.
|
2 - 4 am
|
overnight control, dawn phenomenon, nocturnal
hypoglycemia
|
|
6.
|
suspected hyper- and hypoglycemia
|
early detection
|
|
7.
|
prior to driving
|
detect/treat hypoglycemia and road safety
|
|
8.
|
before, during, and after exercise
|
prevent hypoglycemia
|
|
9.
|
during sickness
|
assess blood glucose, institute appropriate
therapy
|
|
FIGURE 1. Example
of a Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG)
Flow Sheet that patients can periodically
fax or mail to the office. |
|
Fax Date_____________ Attention Dr._____________ Nurse____________
Patient name_________________DOB__________Patient’s
phone ________
Current medication or insulin dose __________________________________
BG Targets: pre-meal____________ post-meal_____________
Carb ratio________ Supplemental Factor_________
(if applicable)
|
Date
|
12 am
|
3 am
|
before bkfst
|
after bkfst
|
before lunch
|
after lunch
|
before supper
|
after supper
|
bedtime
|
other times
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIGURE 2. Meter
Download into a Data Management System displaying
a 14-Day Summary Log Book, Graph, and Pie
Chart of glucose patterns. |
|
FIGURE 3. Blood
glucose recordings of a patient before and
after initiating insulin pump therapy using
the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
(CGMS) Gold. |
|
FIGURE 4. The MiniMed Paradigm REAL-Time
Insulin Pump and Continuous Glucose Monitoring
System. |

|
FIGURE 5. The Bayer DCA 2000+ Analyzer
for Point-of-Care Office Measuremen |
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
National diabetes fact sheet: general information
and national estimates on diabetes in the
United States, 2005. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2005. Available
at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet05.htm,
accessed 4-20-07.
- American Diabetes Association: Clinical
Practice Recommendations 2007. Standards of
medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl
1):S4-S41. Available at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/30/suppl_1/S4,
accessed 4-20-07.
- Hirsch IB, Brownleee M. Should minimal glucose
variability become the gold standard of glycemic
control? J Diabetes Compl 2005;19:178-181.
- American Diabetes Association. Self-monitoring
of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1996;19(Suppl
1):S62-S66.
- Harris MI. Frequency of blood glucose monitoring
in relation to glycemic control in patients
with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:979-982.
- Del Prato S. In search of normoglycemia
in diabetes: controlling postprandial glucose.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26 (Suppl
3):S9-S17.
- Thayer AM. Deciphering diseases. Chem Engineering
News 1999;30:19-28.
- American Diabetes Association 2005 Resource
Guide. Blood glucose meters and data management
systems. Diabetes Forecast;5:RG36-RG54.
- Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B, Pichler M. Newer
portable glucose meters-analytical improvement
compared with previous generation devices?
Clin Chem 1999;45:1821-1825.
- American Diabetes Association. Tests of
glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24(Suppl
1):S80-S82.
- Kabadi UM, O'Connell KM, Johnson J, Kabadi
M. The effect of recurrent practice at home
on the acceptability of capillary blood glucose
readings. Accuracy of self blood glucose testing.
Diabetes Care 1994;10:1110-1123.
- Pfutzner A, Hermanns N, Schroder S, Wegenstein
M, Larbig M, Mondok A. Cross-sectional investigation
on the accuracy of alternate site testing
using the Soft-Sense glucose meter. Swiss
Med Weekly 2002;132:351-357.
- Klonoff DC. Continuous Glucose Monitoring:
roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:1231-1239.
- Tanenberg R, Bode B, Lane W, et al. Use
of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
to guide therapy in patients with insulin-treated
diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Mayo
Clin Proc 2004;79:1521-1526.
- Bode B, Gross K, Rikalo N, Schwartz S, Wahl
T, Page C, et al. Alarms based on real-time
sensor glucose values alert patients to hypo-
and hyperglycemia: the guardian continuous
monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Therapeutics
2004;6: 105-113.
- Goldberg PA, Siegel MD, Russell RR, et
al. Experience with the continuous glucose
monitoring system in a medical intensive care
unit. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6(3):339-347.
- Porter KH, Myers GL. Implications of point-of-care
testing for hemoglobin A1c. Diabetes Technol
Therapeutics 2000;2:527-528.
- Edelman SV, Bell JM, Serrano, RB, Kelemen
D. Home testing of fructosamine improves glycemic
control in patients with diabetes. EndocrPract
2001;7:454-458.
- McGill JB, Cole TG, Nowatzke W, et al. Circulating
1,5-anhydroglucitol levels in adult patients
with diabetes reflect longitudinal changes
of glycemia: a U.S. trial of the GlycoMark
assay. Diabetes Care 2004;27(8):1859-65.
|