JOURNAL
Current Issue
Journal Archive
........................................................
September 2007 - Volume 5 Issue 6
Download print-friendly version (700k)
........................................................

From the Editor
Editorial - Abdul Abyad, MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE (Chief Editor)
........................................................
Focus on Quality Care
Research to policy in the Arab world: lost in translation
........................................................

Original Contribution and Clinical Investigation

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in primary health care – An area based study

Diabetic Foot: Correlation between clinical abnormalities and electrophysiological studies

........................................................
Medicine and Society
Immunization coverage among slum children: A case study of Rajshahi City Corporation, Bangladesh
Vaccination practices and factors influencing expanded programme of immunization in the rural and urban set up of Peshawar
........................................................
Clinical Research and Methods
Rising Caesarean Section Rate in Developed Countries is not the Best Option for Childbirth
Chronic Headache: The role of the Nasal Septum Deformity
........................................................

Chief Editor -
Abdulrazak Abyad MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE

.........................................................

Publisher -
Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
572 Burwood Road,
Hawthorn 3122
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9819 1224
Fax: +61 (3) 9819 3269
Email
: lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

Editorial Enquiries -
abyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................

Advertising Enquiries -
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

While all efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this journal, opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Publishers, Editor or the Editorial Board. The publishers, Editor and Editorial Board cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; or the views and opinions expressed. Publication of any advertisements does not constitute any endorsement by the Publishers and Editors of the product advertised.

The contents of this journal are copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this program may be reproduced without the permission of the publisher.

September 2007 - Volume 5, Issue 6
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in primary health care
- An area based study

..........................................................................................................................

Huda Al-Ghareeb
Qurain Health Centre, Ahmadi Health Area, Ministry of Health, Kuwait

Correspondence to:
Dr Huda Alghareeb
Family Physician & Head of Qurain special Clinic
PO Box 707
Jaber Alali City
Kuwait
Tel: (965) 3842345
Mobile: 9842252
Fax: (965) 3832345
..........................................................................................................................

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of our study was to estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among selected Kuwaiti patients in Ahmadi & Mubarak Al-Kabir area attending a primary health care clinic.

Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional study of consecutive Kuwaiti participants who attended the Qurain special clinic by call, aged between 20-60 years during March, April, May, June 2006. Four-hundred and ninety five participants 214 (43.2%) males and 281(56.7%) females were interviewed in detail about their social, demographic, socioeconomic, life style and health diseases status. This was done using the WHO stepwise approach to surveillance of non communicable diseases step s, after translation to Arabic. Diagnosis of MS was based on NCEP-ATP 111 criteria.

Results: The total number who met the ATP111 guidelines for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was 194 (39.19%). 106 (37.7%) of them were females and 88(41.1%) males. Significantly MS increased by age.

MS criteria were significantly commoner in men than women for increased waist circumference and increased triglyceride and diastolic BP.

Conclusion: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is high among Kuwaiti participants attending a primary health clinic in Kuwait.

It is recommended that doctors in primary care settings should be aware of the five risk factors related to metabolic syndrome with a view to offering appropriate treatment.

Key words: Metabolic Syndrome, prevalence, Kuwait, Primary care
..........................................................................................................................
.

INTRODUCTION

The metabolic syndrome is a common disorder characterized by central obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension and atherogenic dyslipidemia (including the combination of hyper-triglyceridemia, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a preponderance of small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles.[3,4,30]

Metabolic syndrome was described first in 1988 [10]. In recent years MS has attracted muchattention and definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed by various medical societies.

Recently, the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel 111(NCEP-ATP 111) drew attention to the importance of metabolic syndrome and provides a working definition of this syndrome. [2, 13, 14, 20, 26 and 30].

The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome is based upon the demonstration of at least three of the following five criteria to make a diagnosis as shown in Table 1[9 26, 30].

A recent report from the independent market analyst, Datamonitor, revealed that 115 million people in the US, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK suffer from metabolic syndrome .It is a global epidemic that is growing fast due to increasing obesity and sedentary life styles.

The metabolic syndrome is a constellation of interrelated risk factors of metabolic origin - metabolic risk factors that appear to directly promote the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease[1,2,4,5,6,9,10,15,17,20,23,26,30,33] and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus [2, 6, 20,23,33] as well as increased mortality from cardiovascular disease and all its causes [2, 5, 14, and 21, 30].

Although ATP 111 did not make any single risk factor (e.g. abdominal obesity) a requirement for diagnosis, it nonetheless espoused the position that abdominal obesity is an important underlying risk factor for the syndrome [6].

The growth in prevalence of the metabolic syndrome parallels the dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity. [30]

GLOBAL EXPERIENCES

A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted during March, April, May and June 2006 from two primary health areas (Ahmadi and Mubarak Al-kabir area) in a primary health centre Qurain clinic.

A stratified sampling method was used to select the participants of a total 495 (214 males and 281 females)' of Kuwaiti nationality.

The participants were invited by Telephone call; all participants gave informed consent at baseline and answered a structural questionnaire by using WHO stepwise approach to surveillance of non communicable diseases steps after translation to Arabic. The questionnaire contained items on social, demographic data (birth date and sex), lifestyle (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity), socioeconomic status (education level, occupation) self reported health conditions (disease status as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer) and family history of disease. Examinations were performed including weight, height and waist circumference while the participant was lightly clothed.

Blood pressure was measured 3 times after the subject had been seated for = 5 minutes, and the mean of the last 2 readings was used for analysis.

All subjects were asked to fast overnight for = 8 hours before blood specimen collection. Venous blood was collected without anticoagulant in vacutainer tubes. Fasting glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride and all lab tests were done in Amiri hospital using Synchron LX 20 clinical systems.
According to NCEP ATP criteria, a participant has metabolic syndrome if he or she has three or more of the following criteria: [4, 8, and 21]

1. High blood pressure: = 130\85 mmHg
2. Hypertriglyceridemia: = 150mg\dl (=1.70 mmol\l
3. Low HDL cholesterol : < 40 mg\dl (<1.04mmol\l) in men and <50 mg\dl (<1.30 mmol\l) in women.
4. Abdominal obesity: waist circumference >102cm in men and >88cm in women
5. -High fasting glucose: =110 mg\dl (=6.1)

The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Study SPSS version12. The p value was derived using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Of the 495 participants recruited into the study, 194 (39.19%) met the ATP111 guidelines for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome as shown in Table 1. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome increased by age among different age groups as shown in Table 4.The prevalence of MS was 11.9% for those aged 20-29, 27.4% for those aged 30-39, 50.9% for those aged 40-49 and 69% for those aged 55-60, and the difference between the age group is statistically significant (p< 0.000).

The prevalence of patients with and without metabolic syndrome by gender is shown in Table 3. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome differed little among men and women (p< 0.192), which are not statistically significant. The prevalence of each of the five ATP 111 criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome is shown in Table 2.

In our study the criteria with the highest prevalence was low HDL-c (75.5%) of the screened population while the lowest was that of impaired fasting blood sugar (23.03%). Raised plasma TG was found in 24.8%, increased waist circumference was found in 52.4%, and high BP was found in 39.4%.The difference between males and females for increased waist circumference and increased triglyceride were statistically significant (p<0.05) while the difference between genders for the remaining criteria was not statistically significant as shown in Table 2. Diastolic BP was statistically more significant than systolic BP as shown in Table 6.

DISCUSSION

A survey of 495 Kuwaiti citizens ofAhmdi &Mubarak Al-kabir area attending Qurain special clinic by call, aged between 20 and 60 years showed that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was relatively high. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is 194 (39.19%) in this study, which was remarkably high, by using ATP 111 criteria for analysis.

Our data showed a significant relationship between age and metabolic syndrome (df =15,p value= 0.000). This result is consistent with other authors in other studies {7,12,19,20,22, ,24}. Also our study showed that metabolic syndrome increases with age {2, 8, 18, 30, and 31}. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome by sex (df =5,p value 0.192). This result is consistent with other authors in other studies {2,29} and different to yet other studies which showed significant relationship between gender and metabolic syndrome [32]: men had higher incidence than women {8,11,19,28,30}. Women had a higher incidence than men {16, 18, 20, 24, and 27} in our study.This study has certain limitations. This is an area-based study conducted in two health districts. The result of this study may therefore be stronger and more significant if it included several additional health districts of Kuwait.

CONCLUSION

The increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome is likely to lead to future increases in cardiovascular disease and Diabetes.

It is important to identify and follow subjects with MS, even in apparently healthy populations, to enable early disease management.

People indicate the need to focus attention on public health strategies that target adolescents and young adults to reduce the burden of the syndrome in the future. It also means clinical strategies are needed to identify and provide interventions for the substantial number of persons already affected by the syndrome.

Education and training will be critical to ensure that health care providers have the knowledge and the skills necessary to properly treat patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Table 1. Criteria for diagnosing metabolic syndrome (three or more of the risk factors) according to the National Cholesterol Educational Program's ATP 111 Criteria {3, 4}

Risk factor

Defining level

Abdominal obesity

Men

Women

TG

HDL-C

Men

Women

Blood Pressure

Fasting  Blood glucose

Waist circumference

>102 cm

>88 cm

≥ 1.70 mmol\l (150mg/dl)

< 1.04mmol\l (40 mg/dl)

<1.30(50 mg/dl)

≥130/85

≥ 6.11mmol\l (110 mg/dl)


Table 2. Prevalence of each of the ATP 111 criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome among the screened population (n=495)

Criteria

Sex

Total

P value

    F

   M

Impaired FBS     

                              0

                              +

                         Total

Increased waist circumference

                              0

                              +

                         Total

Elevated plasma TG

                              0

                              +

                           Total

Reduced HDL

                             0

                             +

                           Total

Elevated Bp

                            0

                            +

                           Total

 

218

63

281

 

106

164

270*

 

223

58

281

 

67

214

281

 

177

103

280**

 

163

51

214

 

124

90

214

 

149

65

214

 

54

160

214

 

122

92

214

 

381

114

495

 

230

254

484

 

372

123

495

 

121

374

495

 

299

195

494

 

 

 

0.712

 

 

 

0.000

 

 

 

0.013

 

 

 

0.721

 

 

 

0.162

*11 pregnant ladies excluded, ** 1 lady refused to check

Table 3: Prevalence of each of the ATP111 criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome by sex.

Criteria

              Sex

Total

P value

    F

  M

Criteria         No

                       +

                        ++

                        +++

                       ++++

                       +++++

Total

 37

66

72

52

34

20

281

21

61

44

52

27

9

214

58

127

116

104

61

29

495

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.192


Table 4. Prevalence of each of the ATP111 criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome by age groups.

Age gp

Criteria

Total

P value

 No 

+

++

+++ 

++++

+++++

20-

30-

40-

''50-60

Total

33

11

11

3

58

65

35

20

7

127

20

28

47

21

116

11

17

53

23

104

5

11

18

27

61

0

0

10

19

29

134

102

159

100

495

 

 

 

 

0.000


Table 5. Prevalence of each of the ATP111 criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome by age-sex groups

Age-sex gp

                       Criteria

Total

P value

 No 

+

++

+++ 

++++

+++++

200

201

300

301

400

401

500

501

Total

22

11

6

5

6

5

3

0

58

34

31

19

16

11

9

2

5

127

12

8

18

10

29

18

13

8

116

4

7

8

9

26

27

14

9

104

1

4

6

5

11

7

16

11

61

0

0

0

0

8

2

12

7

29

73

61

57

45

91

68

60

40

495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.000


Table 6. Prevalence of each of Bp of the ATP 111 criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome among the screened population (n=494)

Sex

 Total

P value

     F

      M

Sys             o

                   +

Total

Dias           o

                   +

Total

182

98

280

216

64

280

137

77

214

148

66

214

319

175

494

364

130

494

 

 

0.821

 

 

0.046


REFERENCES
  1. Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L. The Metabolic Syndrome, Prevelance and Associated risk factor findings in the US population,1988-1994,Arch Intern Med,2003,136:427-436.
  2. Earls Ford, MD, MPH,Wayne H.Giles, MD,MSC, Prevelance of the metabolic syndrome among US adults,JAMA,2002,287No 3:356-359.
  3. Khunti K , Davies M. Metabolic Syndrome independently raises cardiovascular risk and should be picked up in primary care,BMJ 2005,331:1153-1154 .
  4. Anton F.H Stalenhoef, Christie M, Ballantyne: a Comparative Study with rosuvastatin in subjects with Metabolic Syndrome: results of COMETS study: European Heart Journal, 2005(Sep):1-9.
  5. Kahn R Bused J, Ferrannini E. The Metabolic Syndrome: Time for a critical appraisal, Diabetes Care 2005, 28:2289-2304.
  6. Scott M.Grundy, James I.Cleeman, Stephen R. Daniels.Diagnosis and management of the Metabolic Syndrome: Circulation, 2005, 112:2735-2752.
  7. GuptaR, Deedwania PC, Gupta A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an Indian Urban population. International J of Cardiology, 2004 97(2):257-61.
  8. Maumus S, Marie, B, Siest G. A prospective study on the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Healthy French families: Diabetes Care, 2005.28 (3):675-82.
  9. E.l.Sorkhou,B.Al Qalaf: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among hypertensive patients attending a primary care clinic in Kuwait :
    Med PrincPract 2004, 13:39-42.
  10. Sone H, Mizuna S, Fujii Hitome... Is the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome useful for predicting cardiovascular disease in Asian Diabetic patients? Diabetic care 2005 (28):1463-1471
  11. Arai H, Yamamoto A, Matsuzawa Y.Prevalence pf Metabolic Syndrome in the general Japanese population in 2000: J of Atherosclerosis& thrombosis. , 2006, 13(4):202-8.
  12. Martinez CandelaJ, Franch Nadal J, Romero Ortiz. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in the adult population of Yecla (Murcia).Atencion Primaria, 2006, 38(2):72-9.
  13. Cordero fort A, Moreno Arribas j, Martin Arnau: Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and association with IHD in Cardio logical outpatients (Spanish). Revista clinical Espanola. 2006, 206 (6):259-65.
  14. Sarkar S, Das M,Mukhopadhyay B. High prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and its correlates in two tribal populations of India and the Impact of Urbanization. Indian J of Medical Research. , 2006, 123 (5):679-86.
  15. Csaszar A, Kekes E, Abel T.Prevalence of Metabolic syndrome estimated by International Diabetes federation criteria in a Hungarian population.
    Blood Pressure. 2006, 15(2):101-6.
  16. Sanisoglu SY, Oktenli C, Hasimi A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome &related disorders in a large adult population in Turkey.BMC Public Health. 6:92, 2006.
  17. Savage PD, Banzer JA, BaladyGJ. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in cardiac rehabilitation\ 2ry prevention programs.AHJ, 2005, 149(4):627-31.
  18. Soysal A, Demiral Y, Soysal D.The prevalence of metabolic syndrome among young adults in Izmir Turkey. Anadolu Kordiyoloji Derjisi , 2005, 5 (3):196-201.
  19. Algeria E, Cordero a, Laclaustra M. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Spanish working population, (Spanish).Rev ESP Cardiol, 2005. 58(7):797-806.
  20. Chuang SY, Chen H, ChouT. Prevalence of MS in a large health check-up population in Taiwan. JCMA .2004, 67 (12):611-20.
  21. Santos AC, Lopes C, Barros H.Prevalence of MS in the city of Porto
    Revista Portuguesa de cardiologia, 2004 23(1):45-52.
  22. Alvarez Cosmea A, Lopez Fernandez. Differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the ATP 111 and WHO definitions [Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005,124 (10):368-70.
  23. James B Meigs, the metabolic syndrome, May be a guidepost or detour to preventing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease .BMJ 2003, 327(7406): 61-62.
  24. Azizi F, Salehi P, Etemadi A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an urban population: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice. 2003, 61 (1):29-37.
  25. Szabo J, B Goldfareb. Metabolic syndrome rising in adults and adolescents. Doc News, Jan 1, 2005, 2(1):7-7.
  26. James I.Cleeman. Executive Summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel 111) JAMA 2001, 285(19):2486-2497.
  27. De Oliveira, Ennesto P.Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a semi-arid rural area in Bahia [Portuguese] Arquvos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia e Metabologia.50 (3):456-65, 2006 Jun
  28. LohsoonthornV, Dhanamun B, Williams MA. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its relationship to white blood cell count in a population of Thai men and women receiving routine health examinations. American J of hypertension. 2006, 19 (4): 339-45.
  29. Atabek ME, Pirgon O.Kurtoglu S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in obese Turkish children &adolescent. Diabetes research &Clinical Practice. , 2006;72(3):315-21.
  30. Domanski M, Proschan M .The Metabolic Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 43:1396-1398.
  31. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination. JAMA 2002, 287:356-359.
  32. Relimpio F, Martinez-Brocca MA, Leal-Cerro A. Variability in the presence of the metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetic patients attending a diabetic clinic: influence of age and gender. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004, 65:135-142.
  33. Blaha M, Elasy T. Clinical use of the metabolic syndrome: why the confusion? Clinical diabetes, 2006(24):125-131.

.................................................................................................................
 

I About MEJFM I Journal I Advertising I Author Info I Editorial Board I Resources I Contact us I Journal Archive I MEPRCN I Noticeboard I News and Updates
Disclaimer - ISSN 148-4196 - © Copyright 2007 medi+WORLD International Pty. Ltd. - All rights reserved