JOURNAL
Current Issue
Journal Archive
........................................................
July 2007 - Volume 5 Issue 5
Download print-friendly version (876k)
........................................................

From the Editor
Editorial - Abdul Abyad, MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE (Chief Editor)
........................................................
Focus on Quality Care
Toward better community based education program in Iraq
........................................................

Original Contribution and Clinical Investigation

The etiological agents of Mastitis in Lactating Women in Iran

........................................................

Review Articles

Do other classroom activities change primary care physicians’ health care practice?
........................................................
Medicine and Society
Environmental Predictors For High Blood Lead Levels Among Women In Childbearing Age In Mosul City
Patient Expectation vs Satisfaction: A Study from Bangladesh
........................................................
Clinical Research and Methods
Efficacy of Antibiotics in Women with Symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection but Negative Dipstick Urinalysis: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
The Clinical Evaluation of Herbal Anti-malarial Medicine: SCAT

Prevalence Of Allergic Rhinitis & Its Risk Factors Among An-Najah University Students - Nablus/Palestine

........................................................

Chief Editor -
Abdulrazak Abyad MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE

.........................................................

Publisher -
Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
572 Burwood Road,
Hawthorn 3122
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9819 1224
Fax: +61 (3) 9819 3269
Email
: lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

Editorial Enquiries -
abyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................

Advertising Enquiries -
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

While all efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this journal, opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Publishers, Editor or the Editorial Board. The publishers, Editor and Editorial Board cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; or the views and opinions expressed. Publication of any advertisements does not constitute any endorsement by the Publishers and Editors of the product advertised.

The contents of this journal are copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this program may be reproduced without the permission of the publisher.

July 2007 - Volume 5, Issue 5
The Etiological Agents of Mastitis in Lactating Women in Iran
..........................................................................................................................

Bakhshandeh-Nosrat S (1), Ghazisaidi K (2), Ghaemi E.O (3),
Fatemi Nasab F
(4), Mohamadi M (5).

  1. Assistant Professor, Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  2. Professor, Microbiology Department, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  3. Associate Professor, Microbiology Department, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  4. Assistant Professor, Immunology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  5. MS in medical Microbiology, Tehran university of Medical Sciences, Iran

Address correspondence to:
Bakhshandeh-Nosrat S, email: sb_nosrat@yahoo.com
..........................................................................................................................

ABSTRACT

Mastitis is an inflammatory condition of the breast; and is usually associated with lactation, and therefore called lactational mastitis.

The two principle causes of mastitis are milk stasis and infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the etiological agents of mastitis in lactating women in Tehran, Iran and to determine the bacterial pattern of resistance.

A total of 203 milk samples were taken from puerperal women hospitalized in Tehran, and suffering from mastitis during the years 2003-04. These samples were examined by bacteriological methods. After identification of the bacteria by biochemical tests, their antibiotic sensitivity was assessed by disk diffusion method.

From 203 samples, 26 samples (12.8%) were culture positive, 21 (80.8%) were Coagulase negative Staphylococcus and 5 (19.2%) samples were Staphylococcus aureus.
All strains of S.aureus and Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus were sensitive to Cloxacillin, Fluxacillin and Dicloxacillin.

Our findings showed that Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase negative Staphylococcus were the major etiological agents of mastitis in Iranian women.

Key words: mastitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus
..........................................................................................................................
.

INTRODUCTION

Mastitis is an inflammatory condition of the breast. It is usually associated with lactation, therefore it is also called lactational mastitis. (1)

Mastitis usually occurs during the second or thirds weeks opost partum (2). In the majority of reports 74 to 95% of mastitis occurs in the first 12 weeks post partum(3) and it is seldom observed after 12th week post partum.(2)

Mastitis is relatively common and the reported incidence varies from a few to 33% of lactating women (4, 5, and 6).

The two principle causes of mastitis are milk stasis and infection. Milk stasis is usually the primary cause, which may or may not be accompanied by or progress to infection. Milk stasis occurs when milk is not excreted completely. Improper attachment of the neonate to the breast, inability of the neonate to suck enough milk, limitation of duration, frequency of lactation and obstruction of lactational canals, can cause milk stasis (1).

Proper conditions for bacterial growth following milk accumulation may be accrued.

The most common isolated organisms in mastitis are Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase negative Staphylococcus. Different types of streptococcus, Gram negative bacilli like E.coli sometimes are found (2, 7) Salmonella, Mycobacterium, Candida and Cryptococcus species are seldom isolated (4).
Several routes have for the entry bacteria to the breast have been suggested, through the lactiferous ducts into a lobe; by haematogenous spread; and through a nipple fissure and abrasions of the nipple into the periductal lymphatic system. Nipple fissure has been reported with increased frequency in the presence of mastitis (7, 8).

Diagnosis of mastitis is usually based on the clinical manifestations. Usually one breast becomes hard, reddened, painful, inflamed, and a reduction in milk secretion is observed (4).

General signs such as fever = 38.5°c, chill and malaise may be observed, but it is not possible to distinguish infective mastitis from non-infective mastitis by clinical manifestation, therefore culturing of a milk sample is recommended to diagnose infective organisms(2 ).

Milk samples with more than 106 leukocytes and more than 103 bacteria /ml is indicative of infective mastitis, (1) The diagnosis of mastitis is important due to two reasons. Firstly, it is the cause for reduction of milk production and almost 25% of mothers avoid breast feeding (4, 5) with subsequent influence on infants' health (9). Secondly, mastitis increases the possibility of infection transmission from mothers to their infants. In Rotaviruses the risk of transmission increases by two to four fold (10) and suggests that mastitis may increase the risk of transmission of HIV through breastfeeding (11)
Due to the importance and significant role of mastitis in infant's heath, it seems necessary to diagnose women with the signs of mastitis and treat them urgently.

The aim of this study was to determine the etiologic agent of mastitis in lactating women and their antibiotic resistance pattern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out on 203 milk samples of puerperal lactating women hospitalized in Mirza kochakkhan hospital in Tehran during the years 2003-04. Clinical findings of mastitis were confirmed by the physician, in all women. Before sampling, all women washed their breasts with warm water, and their hands with soap and water. The first few drops of their milk was thrown away and 5ml of milk was collected in sterile tubes afterwards. The samples were immediately transported to the laboratory for culturing and microscopic examination. The samples were inoculated in different bacterial culture media and were incubated at 37°c for 24 h. The determination of isolated bacteria was done by suitable biochemical tests and direct smear (12). Drug sensitivity tests were performed by disk diffusion method using a Muller Hinton agar.

RESULTS

From 203 samples, 26 samples (12.8%) and 177 samples (87.2%) were positive culture and negative culture respectively. From 26 samples with positive culture, 21 samples (80.8%) were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) and 5 samples were Staphylococcus aureus. (Figure 1)

Figure 1: Distribution of Bacteria in Mastitis in Iranian Women

Sensitivity and resistance of isolated staphylococci to different antibiotics were shown in Table 1. All strains of S.aureus and Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) were sensitive to Cloxacillin, Fluxacillin and Dicloxacillin.

Table 1: Drug Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CNS) isolated from mastitis in Lactating Women in Iran

Sample

S.aureus Resistance

*CNS Resistance

Number

Percent (%)

Number

Percent (%)

Amoxicillin

3

60

6

6/28

Tetracycline

2

40

5

8/23

Erythromycin

2

40

4

19

Azithromycin

2

40

4

19

Fluxacillin

0

0

0

0

Dicloxacillin

0

0

0

0

Cloxacillin

0

0

0

0

Cephalothin

3

60

3

3/14

Co- trimoxazole

4

80

8

1/38

*Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus

 

DISCUSSION

In this study 203 milk samples were taken from puerperal lactating women with mastitis. 26 samples were positive culture. From 5 samples Staphylococcus aureus was isolated. In numerous reports, Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus aureus were considered as the most common factors of mastitis (2,7) similar to our study. In investigations of Aabo et al (13) and Matheson et al (14), the prevalence of isolated Staphylococcus aureus in milk samples of puerperal women with mastitis was higher than in healthy women.

Bacteria are often found in milk from asymptomatic breasts. The spectrum of bacteria is often very similar to that found on skin. Bacteriological studies are therefore complicated by the difficulty of avoiding contamination from skin bacteria (15). Thus the presence of bacteria in the milk does not necessarily indicate infection, even if they are not contaminants from the skin.

Fresh human milk is not normally a good medium for bacterial growth. Cell counts and bacterial colony counts are useful to distinguish between infectious and non-infectious mastitis. In this study we tried to provide proper conditions of sampling, we asked mothers to wash their breasts with warm water and wash their hands with water and soap and let run the first few drops of milk, the subsequent drops were collected in sterile tubes.

According to W.H.O.'s reports, a sample of >106 leukocytes and > 103 bacteria /ml is an indication of infective mastitis (1) therefore the colony count of bacteria in this study was considered and the samples with more than 103 bacteria were assessed, but in 30 other samples the number of colonies was less than 103 /ml. This observation can be attributed to contamination of samples with skin organisms.

Mastitis, if untreated, can lead to lactation failure, recurrent mastitis, or breast abscess. The early diagnosis and treatment of mastitis may help prevent more serious suppurative infection, recurrent mastitis, and other complications. In a study recurrent mastitis developed in 13 patients (10.2%) within a median of 24 weeks of follow-up (16)

In our study all isolated Staphylococcus were sensitive to Fluxacillin, Dicloxacillin, and Cloxacillin.This means these antibiotics can be used for treatment of mastitis but Erythromycin, Fluxacillin, Dicloxacillin, Amoxicillin and Cephalothin were recommended for the treatment of infective mastitis by WHO(1). Our finding shows that most strains of isolated bacteria were sensitive to Erythromycin and Azithromycin, followed by Erythromycin and Tetracycline and these antibiotics must be considered as first stage in treatment of mastitis.

As mentioned, mastitis is common in various populations and affects neonate's nutrition and neonatal health, so prophylaxis of mastitis is an important matter to be looked at in neonatal health. Proper methods of lactation such as, close relation of mother and neonate, suitable attachment of neonate to the breast, and the frequency and duration of lactation are among the best ways to prevent milk stasis and infection.

If the infection occurs it should be diagnosed and treated by suitable antibiotics such as Erythromycin, Cephalothin and if necessary, by Cloxacillin or their related antibiotics.
Antibiotic therapy must be used with suitable methods of lactation to stimulate the milk evacuation.
The results of this survey indicated the role of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus in causing infective mastitis.

REFERENCES
  1. World Health Organization. Mastitis: Causes and Management. Department of child and Adolescent Health and Development. WHO/FCH/CAH/00.13.Geneva.2000. 1-50
  2. Giugliani E.R.J. Common problems during lactation and their management. Journal de pediatria. 2004.80(5 suppl): S147-154
  3. Riordan JM, Nichols FH. A descriptive study of lactation mastitis in Long-term breastfeeding women. Journal of Human Lactation.1990.6)2):53-58.
  4. Michoe CA, Lockie F, Lynn W. The challenge of mastitis. Arch Dis Child.2003.88:818-821.
  5. Fetherston C. Characteristics of Lactation mastitis in a western Australian Cohort. Breastfeed Rev, 1997.5(2): 5-11.
  6. Kinlay J R, O'Connell D L, Kinlay S. Incidence of mastitis in breastfeeding women during the first six months after delivery: a prospective cohort study. Med J Aust. 1998;169:310-312
  7. Foxman B, D Arcy H, Gillespie B, Bobo J. K and Schwarts K. Lactation Mastitis: Occurrence and Medical Management among 946 Brastfeeding women in the untied states. Am J Epidemiol. 2002. 155(2):103-14.
  8. Livingstone VH, Stringer LJ: The treatment of staphylococcus aureus infected sore nipples: A randomized comparative study. J Hum Lact. 1999.15:241-46.
  9. Filteau S. Low-Cost intervention to decrease mastitis among lactating women. Acta paediatr. 2004.93:1156-1158.
  10. Semba RD, Kumwenda N, Hoover DR, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus load in breast milk, mastitis and mother to child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis. 1999.180:93-8.
  11. Dorosko, Stephanie M. Vitamin A, Mastitis, and Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV-1 Through Breast-Feeding: Current Information and Gaps in Knowledge. http://www.redorbit.com/news/health
  12. Larsen HS, Mahon CR. Staphylococcus. In: Mahon CR, Manuselis G, ends. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 1st ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company.2000: 330-343.
  13. Aabo O, Matheson I, Aursnes I, Horgen M, Layerlov P, Melby K. Mastitis in genral practice. Is bacteriologic examination useful? Tadsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990. 110(16): 2075-7.
  14. Matheson I, Aursnes I, Horgen M, Aabo D, Melby K. Bacteriological findings and clinical symptoms in relation to clinical outcome in puerperal mastitis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scaned.1988.67(8):723-6.
  15. Thomsen AC. Infectious mastitis and occurrence of antibody-coated bacteria in milk. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 144(3):350-351
  16. Dener C,Inan A..Breast abscesses in lactating women.World J Surg. 2003 Feb;27(2):130-3

.................................................................................................................
 

I About MEJFM I Journal I Advertising I Author Info I Editorial Board I Resources I Contact us I Journal Archive I MEPRCN I Noticeboard I News and Updates
Disclaimer - ISSN 148-4196 - © Copyright 2007 medi+WORLD International Pty. Ltd. - All rights reserved