The
prevalence of metabolic syndrome among patients
with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Basrah
..........................................................................................................................
Abbas Ali Mansour MD
Department of Medicine, Basrah College of Medicine
Address correspondence to:
Abbas Ali Mansour MD
Department of Medicine, Basrah College of Medicine
.
Hattin Post Office, PO Box 142, Basrah, 42002
IRAQ
Tel: +964(40) 7801403706
Email: aambaam@yahoo.com
..........................................................................................................................
|
ABSTRACT
Background: Metabolic
syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of multiple
metabolic abnormalities that increase the
risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence
of MetS
in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
(DM).
Methods: This
was a cross sectional hospital based study
of patients with type 2 DM. MetS diagnosis
was based on the presence of 2 of 4 metabolic
abnormalities, which are hypertension, visceral
obesity, high triglyceride and low high
density lipoprotein.
Results: Total
number of patients was 200. Of these there
were 145 males and 55 females. Age range
was 28-88 years, and mean age 51.9±10.6
year. Over all MetS seen in 86% (82.7% of
males and 94.5% of females).
Conclusion:
Highest prevalence of MetS was reported
in this study which includes diabetic patients
only, although this high figure may be due
to a different definition and population
studied with selection bias. The main stay
of management of MetS is dietary modification
and weight reduction which may delay the
development of DM, improves the control
of established DM and decreases morbidty
and mortality associated with this syndrome.
|
Key words: diabetes
mellitus, metabolism, cross sectional studies,
metabolic syndrome.
..........................................................................................................................
According
to the Third Report of the National Cholesterol
Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation
and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults
in USA. Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III)1,2,
MetS (formerly called syndr ome X, insulin resistance
syndrome, dysmetabolic syndrome, cardiovascular
multiple metabolic syndrome, multiple metabolic
syndrome or cardio-metabolic syndrome) was defined,
as when three or more of the following abnormalities
are present, which are: abdominal obesity (AO)
with waist circumference for men >102 cm and
women >88 cm, serum triglycerides (TG) =150
mg/dl (= 1.7 mmol/l), high density lipoprotein
(HDL) cholesterol for men <40 mg/dl ( <
0.9 mmol/l , and for women <50 mg/dl (<
1.0 mmol/l), blood pressure =130/85 mmHg, and
fasting plasma glucose =110 mg/dL(6.1 mmol/l).
The syndrome iis not new, having
been already observed in 1923 by Kylin, who described
the clustering of hypertension, hyperglycemia,
and gout as a syndrome.3
MetS increases the risk for
coronary heart disease and stroke by three fold
with marked increase in cardiovascular mortality.4
The aim of the study is to
assess the prevalence of MetS in patients with
type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) according to the
definition of the ATP III report.
This
was a cross sectional hospital based study of
patients with type 2 DM. It includes patients
with type 2 DM seen in the in-patient and out-patient
clinic of the Basrah Military hospital over a
peroid from Jan 2002 to October 2002. All patients
with type 2 DM, regardless of the duration of
DM, were included if they agreed to particpate
in this study.
The new type 2 DM was diagnosed
according to the American Diabetic Association
(ADA) recommendations in 2002.5 Patients who were
currently on drug treatment for diabetes and hypertension
were considered hypertensive and diabetic respectively.
For blood pressure, the average of second and
third blood pressure measurements in the office
were considered. Two blood pressure recordings
were obtained from the right arm of patients in
a sitting position after 30 minutes of rest at
5-min intervals, and their mean value was calculated.
The women were non-pregnant,
and the blood estimation of lipoprotein was taken
after at least an 8 hour fast. Diabetes duration
ranged from a few days to 30 years.
Since all of our patients were
diabetics, the presence of 2 metabolic abnormalities
other than DM, is enough to establish the diagnosis
of MetS.
The waist circumference was
measured with a soft tape on standing subjects,
midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest.1
Total
number of patients was 200. Of these 145 were
males and 55females. Age range was 28-88 years,
and mean age 51.9±10.6 years. Overall MetS
(Table 1) was seen in 86% (82.7%
of males and 94.5% of females).
Prevalence of different metabolic
abnormalities are presented in Table
2. At least 2 metabolic abnormalities were
seen in 32.5% of patients.
In Table 3,
hypertension was the commonest metabolic abnormality
(76.5%) followed by high TG (69%).
The commonest combinations
that constitute the MetS with diabetes (Table
4) were Hypertension, abdominal obesity, low
HDL and High TG in 26.5%.
An
array of metabolic, hemodynamic, and renal abnormalities
constitutes the cardiometabolic syndrome. A hallmark
of this syndrome is visceral obesity and associated
insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia. The syndrome
is also associated with essential hypertension,
abnormalities in the circadian rhythm of blood
pressure and heart rate, the diabetic dyslipidemic
syndrome, hypercoagulability, hyperuricemia, increased
cardiovascular inflammation, and microalbuminuria,
all of which contribute to an increased risk of
cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.2,6-8
Insulin resistance may be the
underlying feature of MetS .9 The World Health
Organization( WHO) definition of MetS in 199810
is different from that of AHA and ATP III1, where
the WHO defined the MetS as presence of at least
two of the following 1) hypertension, defined
as antihypertensive treatment and/or elevated
blood pressure ( > 160 mmHg systolic or >
90 mmHg diastolic); 2) dyslipidemia, defined as
elevated plasma triglyceride { = 1.7 mmol/l(150
mg/dl)} and/or low HDL cholesterol {< 0.9 mmol/l
in men(40mg/dl), < 1.0 (50 mg/dl)mmol/l in
women} concentrations; 3) obesity, defined as
a high BMI ( =30 kg/m 2 ) and/or a high WHR ratio
( > 0.90 in men, > 0.85 in women); and 4)
microalbuminuria (urinary albumin = 20 µ
g/min). We chose the ATP III definition, because
it is easier as we have difficulity in measuring
microalbuminuria in our area and even some questioned
the value of the last WHO criteria because of
its rarity.11,12
In this study we reported the
highest prevalence of MetS reported in literature
,which was 86% (82.7% of males and 94.5% of females).
The prevalance of MetS among patients with type
2 DM according to WHO definition for women and
men respectively was 84 % and 78%, in Botnia study
( ~ 80% for both sexes) in Finland and Sweden.4
In USA, MetS among adults was seen in 6.7% to
42% according to age (increase with age), with
an age adjusted rate of 23.7%.13 In Saudi patients
MetS is seen in 56% of patients with Type 2 DM
and the commonest component of the syndrome was
hypertension . 14
For all studies MetS was more
common in females females than males. In this
study, hypertension is again the commonest metabolic
abormality and the commoenst constellation of
metabolic abnormalities were hypertension, abdominal
obesity, low HDL and high TG. One explanation
of this high rate of MetS in this study is adoption
of Western lifestylein our society with overweight,
physical inactivity, sedentary behaviour, and
unhealthy dietary habits (non healthier lifestyle).
The prevalence of the MetS
and its components is strongly dependent on the
definition of the different components of the
syndrome,which is still not accepted for all globally.2,4,11,13,15
In conclusion the highest prevalence
of MetS was reported in this study, which includes
diabetic patients only, although this high figure
may be due to different definitions and population
studied with selection bias.13 These figures seem
alarming if no prevention protocol is adopted.The
mainstay of management of MetS is dietary modification
and weight reduction which may delay the development
of DM, improves the control of established DM
and decreases morbidty and mortality associated
with this syndrome.1 Further studies including
all people whether diabetic or not, is mandatory
to estimate the prevalence of MetS.
|
Table
1. Prevalence of according
to sex |
|
|
Number
|
%
|
|
Metabolic
syndrome in all patients
|
172
|
86%
|
|
Metabolic
syndrome in males
|
120
|
82.7%
|
|
Metabolic
syndrome in females
|
52
|
94.5%
|
back
to text
|
Table
2. Prevalence of metabolic abnormalities
among study group according to sex.
|
|
Number
of metabolic abnormalities
|
Men
|
Women
|
Total
(%)
|
|
4
|
32
|
21
|
53(26.5%)
|
|
3
|
35
|
19
|
54(27%)
|
|
2
|
53
|
12
|
65(32.5%)
|
|
1
|
21
|
3
|
24(12%)
|
|
0*
|
4
|
0
|
4(2%)
|
|
Total
|
145
|
55
|
200
|
|
*They
have only one metabolic abnormality,
which is diabetes.
|
back
to text
|
Table
3. Prevalence of the different
components of MetS among patients according to sex.
|
|
Metabolic
abnormalities
|
Men
|
Women
|
Total
N (%)
|
|
Hypertension
|
106
|
47
|
153(76.5%)
|
|
High
TG
|
105
|
33
|
138(69%)
|
|
Abdominal
obesity
|
83
|
50
|
133(66.5%)
|
|
Low
HDL
|
56
|
34
|
90(45%)
|
back
to text
|
Table
4. Prevalence of different combinations
of the individual component of MetS among patients
of both sexes of type 2 DM.
|
|
Metabolic
abnormalities
|
Men
|
Women
|
Total
|
|
Hypertension+
abdominal obesity+low HDL+High TG
|
33
|
20
|
53(26.5%)
|
|
Hypertension+Abdominal
obesity +high TG
|
23
|
9
|
32(16%)
|
|
Hypertension+High
TG
|
25
|
0
|
25(12.5%)
|
|
Hypertension+
abdominal obesity
|
12
|
8
|
20(10%)
|
|
Hypertension+
abdominal obesity+low HDL
|
6
|
8
|
14(7%)
|
|
Abdominal
obesity +high TG
|
6
|
2
|
8(4%)
|
|
Low
HDL+High TG
|
6
|
0
|
6(3%)
|
|
Hypertension+high
TG+low HDL
|
5
|
1
|
6(3%)
|
|
Low
HDL +hypertension
|
4
|
1
|
5(2.5%)
|
|
Abdominal
obesity +high TG+low HDL
|
1
|
1
|
2(1%)
|
|
Abdominal
obesity+ low HDL
|
0
|
1
|
1(0.5%)
|
|
Abdominal
obesity+low HDL+High TG
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
back
to text
- National
Institutes of Health. Third Report of the National
Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on
Detection,Evaluation,and Treatment of High Blood
Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel
III) .Bethesda,Md: National Institutes of Health
;2001 .NIH Publication No. 01-3670.
- Enzo Bonora, Stefan Kiechl,
Johann Willeit, et al. Prevalence of Insulin
Resistance in Metabolic Disorders.The Bruneck
Study.Diabetes 1998; 7:1643-1649.
- Kylin E: Studien ueber das
Hypertonie-Hyperglyka¨mie-Hyperurika¨miesyndrom.
Zentralblatt fuer Innere Medizin 1923; 44:105-
127.
- Bo Isomaa, Kaj Lahti, Peter
Almgren, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality associated with the MetS. Diabetes
Care 2001;24:683-689.
- Report of the Expert Committee
on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes
Mellitus .The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis
and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes
Care 2002 ; 25:S5-S20.
- James R. Sowers. Update
on the Cardiometabolic Syndrome.Clin Cornerstone
2001; 4:17-23.
- McFarlane SI, Banerji M,
Sowers JR. Insulin resistance and cardiovascular
disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:713-718.
- DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini
E. Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome
responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension,
dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular
disease (Review). Diabetes Care 1991;14:173-194.
- Grundy SM.Hypertriglyceridemia,insulin
resistent and the metabolic syndrome.Am J Cardiol
1999;83:25f-29f.
- Alberti KGMM,
Zimmet PZ, for the WHO Consultation: Definition,
diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and
classification of diabetes mellitus, provisional
report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998;
15:539 -553.
- Bakau
B,Charles MA.Comments on the prvisional report
from the WHO consultation.European Group for
Study of In sulin Resistance(EGIR).Diab Med
1999;16:442-443.
- Hodge
AM, Dowse GK, Zimmet PZ: Microalbuminuria, cardiovascular
risk factors, and insulin resistance in two
populations with a high risk of type 2 diabetes
mellitus. Diabet Med 1996;13:441- 449.
- Ford
ES,Giles WH,Dietz WH.Prevalence of the metabolic
syndrome amoung US adults.JAMA 2002;287:356-359.
- Akbar
DH.Metabolic syndrome is common in Saudi types
2 diabetic patients.Diabetes International 2002;12:47-49.
- Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit
J, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Targher G, Alberiche
M, Bonadonna RC, Muggeo M: Prevalence of insulin
resistance in metabolic disorders: the Bruneck
Study. Diabetes 1998 ;47:1643- 1649.
|