Contemporary
Teenage Pregnancy in Saudi Arabia
.........................................................................................................................
Magdy H Balaha*, Mostafa
A Amr **, Abdelhady A El-Gilany ***, Farid M
Al Sheikh ****
* Prof. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College
of Medicine in Al- Ahsa
** Assistant Prof. of Psychiatry, College of
Medicine in Al- Ahsa
*** Prof. of Public Health, College of Medicine
in Mansoura University, Egypt
**** Consultant of Obstetrics & Gynecology,
Al-Ahsa Maternity and Child Hospital
Correspondence:
Magdy Hassan Balaha
Prof. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College
of Medicine,
Tanta University, Egypt
Obstetrics & Gynecology Department,
College of Medicine in Al-Ahsa
King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
P.O. Box 400 - Hofuf 31982
Saudi Arabia
e-mail: magdy_balaha@yahoo.co.uk,
mbalaha@kfu.edu.sa
Mob: 00966 551 639 003
|
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Few data are available on the extent of
obstetric and psychiatric morbidity among
pregnant adolescents in the Middle East
generally and in Saudi Arabia specifically.
A case-control study was conducted to
determine the prevalence of adverse obstetric
and psychiatric outcomes among primigravid
teenagers in AL-Ahsa Governorate, Saudi
Arabia.
Study design:
The sample consisted of 158 primigravid
adolescents and a convenience sample of
632 older mothers. Information related
to antenatal and perinatal events were
obtained from the cases and their clinic
files. Psychiatric assessment was done
during the interview.
Results:
Antenatal morbidities such as pregnancy
induced hypertension, gestational diabetes,
anemia and antepartum hemorrhage did not
differ between the two groups. We found
no evidence for increased risk of cesarean
section, low birth weight, preterm delivery,
posterm delivery, Apgar score at 1 minute
and neonatal admission to intensive care
units in teenage mothers. The overall
prevalence of psychiatric disorders was
similar in both groups but the anxiety
disorders were significantly higher in
the younger group than in the older group.
This was due to increased prevalence for
the post traumatic stress disorder and
generalized anxiety disorder.
Conclusions
Teenage pregnancy receiving adequate antenatal
care and ending in live births is not
associated with significant adverse obstetric
outcomes or major psychopathology in Al
Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
Key words: Teenage pregnancy, Obstetric
outcome, postnatal psychiatric disorders.
|
Teenage pregnancy is defined
as pregnancy in women under the age of 20, although
in the United States, the term usually refers
to girls younger than 18 years of age. Teenage
pregnancy is a worldwide social problem and
its incidence shows marked variation amongst
developed countries. USA has the highest incidence
in the developed world and the UK has the highest
incidence in Europe.1 Teenage pregnancy
in Saudi Arabia comes as the 69th in the world
ranking and the live birth rate at that age
has an incidence of 38 per 1000.2,3
In Saudi Arabia, antenatal care (ANC) coverage
is comprehensive. The national figure of women
not receiving ANC is 10%.4
Some studies from developed and developing countries
have consistently reported that teenage pregnancy
was at increased risk for pre-term delivery,
low birth weight (LBW) and postnatal depression,5,6
although other studies failed to find such an
association.7,8
In many developing countries, the focus of prenatal
and delivery care is on women's medical and
obstetrical problems and on the baby's wellbeing.
The psychiatric profile of pregnant women as
they experience biological, physical, and physiological
changes need to be more addressed.
To the knowledge of the authors, this study
is the first to assess both the obstetric and
psychiatric morbidity in teenagers in Saudi
Arabia and to examine some associated risk factors.
The aim of the present study was to assess
the prevalence of adverse obstetric and psychiatric
outcomes among primigravid teen-aged mothers
compared with a matched group of older women
in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
This study was conducted
in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia in 2007-09. Data collection
phase was completed over a six month period
in 2007-08 and data processing and analysis
extended to 2009. Al-Ahsa is the largest province
in Saudi Arabia's Eastern region (population
of 908,366).
Maternal services are provided by Al-Ahsa Maternity
Hospital and a network of 47 primary health
care centers (PHCCs) in addition to facilities
in the private sector, ARAMCO Petroleum Company
and National Guard. The antenatal care clinics
provide regular care for pregnant women with
the use of the classic schedule with 13 visits
throughout pregnancy. 9 Women attending PHC
centers represent low and middle social class
residents of Al-Ahsa region. To cross validate
these data, the authors compared the recorded
data with data in maternity cards at PHC centers
and also from the maternity hospital files.
This work utilized a case-control design. All
primiparous with live births were counseled
and invited to be enrolled in the study during
their visit at the PHCCs for infant vaccination
two months after delivery. The comparison group
women were selected from the next four consecutive
primigravid women in the age group of 20-29
years; as four cases for each one study case.
Sample members were assured about data confidentiality
and the data will be used for research purposes
and for improving services. Verbal consent was
obtained from all eligible cases of the sample
and comparison groups.
Some women of both groups were not included
from the start; as those with any pre pregnancy
chronic medical disease (hypertension, diabetes,
renal, cardiac and sickle cell disease), multiple
pregnancies, cases with incomplete filing data
and cases giving birth outside the Maternity
hospital.
From a total of 7109 registered live births
in the chosen PHCCs during the study period,
there were 179 teenage mothers (25 per 1000).
This figure is different from the published
Saudi teenage pregnancy incidence (38 per 1000)
2,3 as this represents only a smaller selected
sample taken from one region; Al Ahsa. Four
second gravidae were excluded and 7 were excluded
due to filing incompleteness or presence of
pre pregnancy disease. The study eligible cases
were 168 teenagers. Their age at delivery ranged
from 16.6- 19.8 years with mean age 17.89 ±
0.65. Our sample has 27 cases less than 18 years
(16.7% of adolescent cases). In the comparison
group, a total of 632 primigravid women (mean
age is 24.2 ± 3.3) were selected.
All eligible cases of the study and comparison
groups were interviewed by trained medical staff
to fill a structured questionnaire; including
some demographic characteristics of the mother
(education, occupation), husband education and
time of first contact with the center, number
of antenatal visits as well as past history
of psychiatric illness. The information on antenatal
outcomes (pregnancy induced hypertension, gestational
diabetes, antepartum hemorrhage, anemia, urinary
tract infection, premature rupture of membranes
(PROM) and polyhydramnios)and. intranatal events
were evaluated including route of delivery,
gestational age at birth, birth weight, 1 minute
Apgar score and the need for neonatal intensive
care unit were obtained from the clinic files.
The psychiatric profile of each woman was assessed
using Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
(MINI) 5th edition as a valid and reliable diagnostic
tool with closed-end questions. The interviewer
read literally these close-ended questions as
verbatim as possible to the interviewees. Psychiatric
diagnosis was made according to the number of
affirmative replies to the specific questions.
10
Statistical analysis
The chi-squared (x2)
or Fisher's Exact test (FET) was used as a test
of significance for comparison of categorical
variables, as appropriate. Unpaired student's
t test was used for comparison No of ANC visits.
P = 0.05 was chosen as the level of statistical
significance using the SPSS version 11 (Statistical
Package for Social Sciences). To quantify the
risk and denotes to the clinical significance
of adverse antenatal or intranatal Obstetric
outcomes and postnatal psychiatric outcomes
in the study group, the odds ratio (OR) and
95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed.
Teenage mothers had
comparable demographic findings to older mothers
with non significant difference. Despite that,
the number of ANC visits didn't show any significant
difference, this study demonstrated that a significant
higher proportion of teenagers (83.3%) had been
booked for ANC in the first trimester. (Table
1)
Teenage mothers had a higher incidence of pregnancy
induced hypertension, anemia, and urinary tract
infections, but this increased incidence was
not statistically significant. The other adverse
antenatal outcomes including gestational diabetes
mellitus, ante partum hemorrhage, and premature
rupture of membranes were comparable. The OR
analysis showed also values of no clinical significance
as the CI was either wide or containing the
value of 1. (Table 2)
Despite teenagers had a lower incidence of
both assisted vaginal deliveries and cesarean
sections if compared to older group, these differences
were not statistically significant. The result
demonstrated that the teenage mothers were neither
at higher risk for delivering low birth weight
nor macrosmic infants. There was no clinically
significant difference as regard the gestational
age at birth, 1 minute Apgar scoring and admission
to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The
OR analysis showed also values of no clinical
significance. (Table 3)
The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in
our sample was 14% of the teenage mothers and
15% of the older mothers, screened positive
for at least one psychiatric disorder. On the
other hand, the prevalence of combined disorders
was higher as shown in table 4.When subgroups
of psychiatric disorders were considered (mood
disorders, anxiety disorders, eating disorders).The
anxiety disorders were higher in the teenager
group probably due to significant increased
prevalence for the post traumatic stress disorder
and generalized anxiety disorder ( P<0.05,
significant OR). (Table 4)
|
Table
1 Demographic
characteristics in the included mothers |
| |
Young mothers
(n=168) |
Older mothers
(n=632) |
Significance |
Husband
education
< secondary
Secondary
> secondary |
61 (36.3%)
65 (38.7%)
42 (25 %) |
220 (34.8%)
255 (40.3%)
157 (24.8%) |
x2
= 0.177
P=0.91 |
Maternal
education
< secondary
Secondary
> secondary |
55 (32.7%)
66 (39.3%)
47 (27.9%) |
202 (32.7%)
265 (41.2%)
165 (26.1%) |
x2
= 0.42
P= 0.81 |
Maternal
occupation
House wives
Working
Students |
122 (72.6)
16 (9.5)
30 (17.9) |
472 (74.7)
59 (9.3)
101(16.0) |
x2
= 0.37
P= 0.8 |
Past history of psychiatric illness
In the family
In the cases |
24 (14.3)
13 (7.7) |
83 (13.1)
50 (7.9) |
x2
= 0.15 (P= 0.7)
x2
= 0.01 (P= 0.9) |
Booking
start (first ANC)
First trimester
Second trimester
Third trimester |
140 (83.3%)
13 (7.74%)
15 (8.9%) |
486 (76.9%)
95 (15%)
51 (8.1%) |
x2
= 6.05
P= 0.048* |
Number
of ANC visits
Range
Mean ±SD |
3-15
7.95 ± 3.3 |
1-14
8.1± 3.7 |
t= 0.47
P= 0.64 |
* Significant
|
Table
2 Adverse
antenatal findings in the included mothers |
|
Young mothers
(n= 168)
No (%) |
Older mothers
(n= 632)
No (%) |
Significance |
OR
(95% CI) |
| Pregnancy
induced hypertension |
7 (4.2%) |
19 (3.2%) |
x2
= 0.26
P=0.6 |
1.4 (0.6-
3.4)
|
| Gestational
diabetes mellitus |
2 (1.2%) |
10 (1.6%) |
FET;
P= 1 |
0.75
(0.16- 3.45) |
| Anemia |
66 (41.8%) |
228 (35.5%) |
x2
= 0.46
P= 0.49 |
1.15 (0.8-
1.6) |
| Antepartum
hemorrhage |
6 (3.8
%) |
37 (5.9%) |
x2
= 0.95
P= 0.3 |
0.6 (0.2-
1.4) |
| Urinary
tract infections |
10 (6.3%) |
31 (4.9%) |
x2
= 0.12
P= 0.72 |
1.23 (0.6-
2.55) |
| Premature
rupture of membranes |
2 (1.3%) |
17 (2.7%) |
FET;
P= 0.4 |
0.44 (0.09-
1.9) |
| Polyhydramnios
|
3 (1.9%) |
11 (1.7%) |
FET;
P= 1 |
1.03 (0.28-3.7) |
FET = Fisher's exact test
|
Table
3 Findings
at birth in the included mothers |
| |
Young mothers (n= 168)
No (%) |
Older mothers
(n= 632)
No (%) |
Significance |
OR (95% CI) |
| Assisted
vaginal delivery |
40 (23.8%) |
216 (34.2%) |
x2
= 6.09
P= 0.01 |
0.6 (0.4
- 0.9) |
| Caesarean
section |
18 (10.7%) |
84 (13.3%) |
x2
= 0.58
P= 0.44 |
0.8 (0.5-
1.3) |
| Preterm
(<37 weeks) |
12 (7.2%) |
38 (6.2%) |
x2
= 0.16
P= 0.68 |
1.2 (0.6-
2.4) |
| Post term
(> 42 weeks) |
6 (3.6%) |
17 (2.7%) |
FET;
P= 0.34 |
1.3 (0.5-3.5) |
| Low Birth
weight (<2500 g) |
14 (8.3%) |
44 (7%) |
x2
= 0.2
P= 0.6 |
1.2 (0.6-
2.3) |
| Macrosomia
(>4000 g) |
6 (3.8%) |
29 (4.6%) |
x2
= 0.13
P= 0.7 |
0.8 (0.3-
1.8) |
1 minute
Apgar
score < 7 |
10 (5.9%) |
35 (5.5%) |
x2
= 0.04
P= 0.8 |
1.1 (0.5-
2.2) |
| Admission
to NICU# |
7 (4.2%) |
33 (5.2%) |
x2
= 0.3
P= 0.57 |
0.8 (0.3-
1.8) |
FET = Fisher's exact test
# = neonatal intensive care unit
|
Table
4 Psychiatric
disorders in the included mothers |
| |
Young mothers (n= 168)
No (%) |
Older mothers
(n= 632)
No (%) |
Significance |
OR
(95% CI) |
| A - Depressive
disorders |
17 (10.1) |
65 (10.3) |
x2
= 0.01
P= 0.9 |
1.05 (0.56- 1.7) |
| Major Depression |
10 (5.9) |
39 (6.2) |
x2
= 0.01
P= 0.9 |
0.9 (0.5- .9) |
| Dysthymia |
7 (4.2) |
26 (4.1) |
x2
= 0.04
P= 0.8 |
1.01 (0.42- 2.4) |
| B - Anxiety
disorders |
29 (17.3) |
88 (13.9) |
x2
= 1.18
P= 0.27 |
1.3 (0.81- 2.04) |
| Panic disorder |
3 (1.8) |
18 (2.9) |
FET
P= 0.59 |
0.6 (0.18- 2.13) |
| Social phobia |
3 (1.8) |
13 (2.1) |
FET
P= 0.55 |
0.87 (0.24- 3.07) |
| Agoraphobia |
2 (1.2) |
7 (1.1) |
FET
P= 0.59 |
1.1 (0.22- 5.22) |
| Obsessive compulsive
disorder |
1(0.6) |
11 (1.7) |
FET
P= 0.24 |
0.34 (0.04- 2.6) |
| Generalized
anxiety disorder |
7 (4.2) |
9 (1.4) |
x2
= 5.46
P= 0.03* |
3* (1.1-
8.2) |
| Post traumatic
Stress disorder |
15 (8.9) |
29 (4.6) |
x2
= 4.81
P= 0.03* |
2.04* (1.06- 3.9) |
| C - Eating disorders |
2 (1.2) |
9 (1.4) |
FET
P= 0.58 |
0.8 (0.1- 3.8) |
* Significant
FET = Fisher's exact test
Teenage pregnancy is
a worldwide social problem and its incidence
shows marked variation amongst developed countries.
USA has the highest incidence in the developed
world and the UK has the highest incidence in
Europe.1
In this research, the authors restricted inclusion
of teenage mothers to only primiparas in order
to have more similar/ homogenous group and to
exclude factors that may contribute to adverse
outcomes in multiparous women. The higher proportion
of teenage primigravidae (83.3%) who were booked
for ANC in the first trimester may reflect good
awareness and may be due to over worried young
women. This study demonstrated that there was
no significant difference regarding both antenatal
and intranatal Obstetric morbidities.
Some studies confirmed that teenage pregnancy
was associated with increased preterm birth,
low birth weight, stillbirths and neonatal and
post neonatal death (Hidalgo L. et al11
Haldre K et al12 Phuong V and Suebnukarn
k13 Maryam K and Ali S14).
The attributable risks were the marital status,
low socioeconomic status, inadequate prenatal
care, the inclusion of too young women.
Some studies conducted in different areas in
Saudi Arabia reported increased rates of preterm
delivery, pre-eclampsia and low birth weight.
(Shawky S. et al15, Mesleh RA
et al16 and Abu-Heija, A et al17).
They included teenagers <18 years which may
be one of the highly contributing factors. Others
have shown no difference in the obstetric outcomes
among teenagers. (Oboro V.O et al (2003)18
Kaisa R et al (2005)19 Raatikainen
K et al (2006)20 Aruda M et al (2008)21).
In the Southern area of Saudi Arabia (Abha),
Mahfouz AA et. Al22 concluded that
the prevalence of anemia, hypertension, rate
of abnormal deliveries and average prenatal
visits were not significantly different among
both age groups and adolescence per se confers
no increased obstetric risk if good prenatal
care is provided.
In Cardiff Births Survey, there was lower incidence
of multiple pregnancies, spontaneous rupture
of membranes >24 h, pregnancy-induced hypertension,
instrumental delivery and Caesarean section
amongst teenage primigravidae but a higher incidence
of anemia, and pyelonephritis.23
In the current study, the overall prevalence
of psychiatric disorders was not statistically
different in both age groups. The prevalence
of psychiatric disorders including the depressive
category in our teenage pregnant women was (14%,
10.1 respectively).
The relationship between motherhood and psychiatric
illness has been extensively studied in recent
years. A large review of 20 studies of the prevalence
of postpartum psychiatric illness showed large
variations related to differences in methodology,
sample size, assessment techniques (self-report
vs. diagnostic interview), timing of assessment
and period of risk24.
In Dubai, Abu-Saleh and Ghubash (1997)25
assessed 94 hospitalized pregnant adult women
in the postpartum period using clinical and
sociocultural instruments, namely the Self-Reporting
Questionnaire (SRQ) on day 2 and the Edinburgh
Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) on day 7 after
delivery, found that the prevalence of psychiatric
morbidity was 24% according to the SRQ and 18%
according to the EPDS.
Interestingly, these rates were higher than
obtained from a sample of Swedish women as psychiatric
disorders were present in 14.1%, Depression
in 10.2% and Anxiety disorders in 6.6% of patients.26
Recent studies on adolescent mothers revealed
rates of depressive symptoms within the first
postnatal 3 months of 53- 56% (Logdson et
al., 2005).27
Eating disorders are rare in our sample. Saudi
culture discourages public display of the female
body. Until a few decades ago, thinness was
equated with poverty or ill health and people
continue to consider mild obesity as a sign
of wealth and health (Al-Sabaie, 1989).28
Interestingly, the anxiety disorders in teenagers
in our study are not surprising as it parallels
the dramatic increase in literacy among females
in Saudi Arabia in a very short period. (Gubash
et al., 1992)29 Also there is
a change in the roles of women in the modern
Saudi society. Women choose to pursue higher
education and careers; also they are less accepting
of having their roles restricted to motherhood.
These factors may be the fuel of intergenerational
conflict that may be culminating in anxiety
and increased sensitivity.30
There are several possible explanations for
the reported differences concerning both the
Obstetric and Psychiatric disorders of teenage
pregnancies in our sample. Firstly, the
age in teenagers varies between studies from
under 13 to under 20 years of age. In the present
study, only 27 cases (16.7%) of teenage mothers
were less than 18 years old and the lowest age
was 16.4 years. The effects of very young age
could thus not be studied separately. However,
one may speculate the effects of young age per
se should be clearer in the youngest age groups.
Secondly, there are many differences
in maternity care systems worldwide. In some
countries maternity care systems are based on
insurance and the availability of these services
depends on the economic circumstances of the
mother, which are likely to be worse in teenage
mothers than in adults. In Saudi Arabia antenatal
and maternity care is provided free of charge.
Finally, Saudi teenage pregnant cases
were married; and received support from their
families. Also fertility concept is highly valued,
reproduction is encouraged by religious and
social beliefs and the bride had higher self-esteem
after having children.
In conclusion, Teenage pregnancy receiving
adequate antenatal care and ending in live births
is not associated with significant adverse obstetric
outcomes or major psychopathology in Al Ahsa,
Saudi Arabia.
We cannot exclude neither recall nor recruitment
bias. Pregnancies ended in still births may
present different characteristics. Our patients
were therefore not representative of all teen-aged
mothers, which potentially limits the generalization
of the current findings. In addition, the study
did not take into account the contribution of
family competence on the psychological adjustment
of young mothers.
Maternity care will also be supplemented with
counseling for the acceptability and implementation
of psychiatric screening at the maternity hospitals
and primary health care centers to provide the
optimal care for young mothers.
The study paves the way for a larger prospective
community-based study.
- UNICEF. A league table of teenage births
in rich nations. Innocenti Report Card No.
3; 2001
- Saudi Arabia City Population; Cities, Towns
& Provinces. http://www.citypopulation.de/SaudiArabia.html
- UNFPA, State of World Population 2003.
http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator_detail.cfm?Country=SA&IndicatorID=127
- Khoja AT and Farid AM. Saudi Arabia Family
Health Survey, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia,
2000.
- Gilbert W et al. Birth outcomes in teenage
pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;
16:265-70.
- Gortzak-Uzan L, et al. Teenage pregnancy:
risk factors for adverse perinatal outcome.
J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10:393-97.
- Bukulmez O and Deren O. Perinatal outcome
in adolescent pregnancies: a case-comparison
study from a Turkish University hospital.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 88:207-12.
- Global Forum for Health Research The 10/90
Report on Health Research 2000. Geneva, Global
Forum for Health Research, 2000.
- El-gilany A, El-wehady A : antenatal care
in al-hassa, saudi arabia: a situation analysis
middle east journal of family medicine 2009;
7, 2.
- Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Harnett Sheehan
K, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta
T, Baker R, Dunbar G. The Mini International
Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.),: The
development and validation of a structured
diagnostic psychiatric interview. Journal
of Clinical Psychiatry, 1998 ; 59 [suppl 20]
: 22-33.
- Hidalgo L. Chedraui PA. Chavez MJ.: Obstetrical
and neonatal outcome in young adolescents
of low socio-economic status: a case control
study Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005; 271: 207-211.
- Haldre K., Rahu K, Karro H, Rahu M: Is
a poor pregnancy outcome related to young
maternal age? A study of teenagers in Estonia
during the period of major socio-economic
changes (from 1992 to 2002) European Journal
of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive
Biology 2007; 131: 45-51.
- Phupong V and Suebnukarn k: obstetric outcomes
in nulliparous young adolescents Southeast
Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 2007; 38:
1.
- Maryam K, Ali S: Pregnancy outcome in teenagers
in East Sauterne of Iran, J Pak Med Assoc
2008; 58:541.
- Shawky S. and Milaat W.: Early teenage
marriage and subsequent pregnancy outcome
, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2000;
6, 1: 46-54.
- Mesleh RA., Al-Aql AS., Kurdi AM. Teenage
pregnancy .Saudi Med J 2001; 22, 10.
- Abu-Heija A., Ali A.M. and Al- Dakheil
S., Obstetrics and perinatal outcome of adolescent
nulliparous pregnant women, Gynecol Obstet
Invest 2002;53 (2): 90-92.
- Oboro V.O et al. Pregnancy outcomes among
nulliparous teenagers in suburban Nigeria,
J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 23 (2): 166-169.
- Kaisa R, Nonna H, Pia KV, Seppo H: Good
outcome of teenage pregnancies in high-quality
maternity care European Journal of Public
Health, 2005; 16, 2: 157-161.
- Raatikainen K., et al. Good outcome of
teenage pregnancies in high-quality maternity
care, Eur J Public Health 2006; 16 (2):157-161.
- Aruda M., et al. Adolescent Pregnancy Diagnosis
and Outcomes: A Six-Year Clinical Sample,
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,
2008; 21: 17-19.
- Mahfouz AA, El-Said MM., A1-Erian RA, Hamid
AM. Teenage pregnancy: are teenagers a high
risk group? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
1995; 59: 17-20.
- Gupta N, Kiran U, Bhal K: Teenage pregnancies:
Obstetric characteristics and outcome, European
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and
Reproductive Biology 2008;137: 165-171.
- O'hara M W, Zekoskei M. Postpartum depression.
In: KUMARR, BROCKINGTIOFN, e d. Motherhood
and mental illness 2. Causes and consequences.
Oxford Butterworths, Heinemann. Woollett,
A., & Phoenix, A. (1996).
- Abou-Saleh MT, Ghubash R : The prevalence
of early postpartum psychiatric morbidity
in Dubai: a transcultural perspective. Acta
Psychiatr Scand 1997; 95: 428-432.
- Andersson L, Sundstrom-Poromaa I, Bixo M,
Wulff M, Bondestam K, Strom M.: Point prevalence
of psychiatric disorders during the second
trimester of pregnancy: a population-based
study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):148-54.
- Logsdon, M. C., Birkimer, J. C., Simpson,
T., & Looney, S.: Postpartum depression
and social support in adolescents. Journal
of Obstetric, Gynecologic,and Neonatal Nursing.
2005; 34, 46-54.
- AL-Sabaie A: Psychiatry in Saudi Arabia
: Cultural Perspectives. Transcultural Psychiatry
Research Review 1989; 26: 245-262.
- Ghubash R , Hamde I and Bebbingtopn E .
The Dubai Community Psychiatric Survey: prevalence
and sociodemographic correlates. SOC Psychiatry
Psychiatr Epidemiology 1992:37:53-61.
- Reid V, Meadows-Oliver M: Postpartum Depression
in Adolescent Mothers: An Integrative Review
of the Literature Journal of Pediatric Health
Care 2007; 21, 5: 289-298.
|