JOURNAL
Current Issue
Journal Archive
...........................................
May 2008 - Volume 6 Issue 4
Download print-friendly version (692kb)
...........................................
From the Editor
........................................................
Original Contributon and Clinical Investigation

Effect of Reproductive Knowledge of Mother on Pregnancy Wastage in Rural Rajshahi of Bangladesh
Shamima Akter, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Md. Atikur Rahman Khan, and J.A.M. Shoquilur Rahman

Utilization of Maternal Health Care Services in Bangladesh: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2000-2004
Md. Mosiur Rahman and Dr. Md. Nurul Islam
........................................................
Review Articles
Malaria in pregnancy
Dr Safaa Bahjat
........................................................

Medicine and Society

A study on abnormal behavior among the youth living in the suburbs
Ali Reza Kaldi, Ali Rahmani Firozja
Health Facilities Differential in the World with Special Reference to Bangladesh
Md. Ismail Tareque
........................................................
Education and Training
Improving Opportunities for Learning in Postgraduate Physician Training Program
Thamer.K.Yousif, Hani AL Moallim
........................................................
Case Reports
Serum Zinc Concentration in Iranain Pre-eclampsic and Normotensive Pregnant Women
I. Nourmohammadi, A. Akbaryan, Sh.Fatemi, A.R. Meamarzadeh and E. Noormohammadi
........................................................

Chief Editor -
Abdulrazak Abyad MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE

.........................................................

Publisher -
Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
572 Burwood Road,
Hawthorn 3122
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9819 1224
Fax: +61 (3) 9819 3269
Email
: lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

Editorial Enquiries -
abyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................

Advertising Enquiries -
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

While all efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this journal, opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Publishers, Editor or the Editorial Board. The publishers, Editor and Editorial Board cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; or the views and opinions expressed. Publication of any advertisements does not constitute any endorsement by the Publishers and Editors of the product advertised.

The contents of this journal are copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this program may be reproduced without the permission of the publisher.

May 2008 - Volume 6, Issue 4

Effect of Reproductive Knowledge of Mothers on Pregnancy Wastage in Rural Rajshahi, Bangladesh
.........................................................................................................................

Shamima Akter, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Md. Atikur Rahman Khan, and J.A.M. Shoquilur Rahman

1. Shamima Akter, M. Phil fellow
Department of Population Science and Human Resource Development,
University of Rajshahi,
Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.
E-mail: samimarub@yahoo.com

2. Md. Mizanur Rahman
Lecturer
Department of Population Science and Human Resource Development,
University of Rajshahi,
Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.
E-mail: mmr_f@yahoo.com

3. Atikur ahman Khan
Assistant Professor
Department of Population Science and Human Resource Development,
University of Rajshahi,
Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh

4. Dr. J.A.M. Shoquilur Rahman
Associate Professor
Department of Population Science and Human Resource Development,
University of Rajshahi,
Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.

Correspondence to:
Shamima Akter, M. Phil fellow
Department of Population Science and Human Resource Development,
University of Rajshahi,
Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.
E-mail: samimarub@yahoo.com

 

ABSTRACT

Reproductive knowledge is a vital factor in bearing a child. To have reproductive knowledge and the adverse effect of it over several birth related factors we have collected data from some selected rural areas of Rajshahi District. Some influential factors those influence the reproductive knowledge and their adverse effect on child bearing and pregnancy wastage have been identified. Analyzing our data by some statistical tools like linear probability models we have found that the reproductive knowledge influences pregnancy wastage of mother. The pregnancy wastage of women in two extreme age groups (below 20 and above 35) is tremendously dodgy where as in other age groups this is relatively benign. Knowledge on healthy reproductive behavior as well as lower acceptance of family planning procedure by contraception substantially reduces the risk of pregnancy wastage; however giving more birth increases this risk.

Keywords and Phrases: Reproductive Health, Pregnancy Wastage, Reproductive Knowledge Rating, and Linear Probability Model.

 

INTRODUCTION

Reproductive health is a crucial part of general health and a central feature of human development. This is a universal concern but is of special importance for women, particularly during the reproductive years. Reproductive health is becoming an emerging issue by United Nations. During the past few decades, there has been a growing recognition of the reproductive health issue for people, particularly women, in the third world countries. Every year at the global level about eight million women suffer from pregnancy related complications and over half a million die. About 99% of them are in developing countries (WHO, 2004). Most of these deaths can be averted even where resources are limited. The poor reproductive health of women in third world countries is an outcome of the general neglect of health and nutrition in childhood and adolescence, which affects their future wellbeing (De Silva 1998).

Improvement of the reproductive health status of women in the third world is being considered as one of the most important goals of human and social development. Reproductive knowledge of mother is highly related to the education level. As about 50% of the total population is woman in Bangladesh, the maternal education is a key factor that can role over a family, even over the country. Specifically, mother's education can change a society which lift-up a country from lower level to upper level because the practices of educated mothers with regard to pregnancy, child birth, immunization, management of childhood diseases etc. are quite different from those of their uneducated counterpart (Govindasamy and Ramesh, 1997). Now to undergo in-depth of our study we would like to discuss some conceptual terms in brief like new concept of reproductive health, knowledge on reproductive health, reproductive age, pregnancy and pregnancy wastage.

New concept of reproductive health

Reproductive health does not start out from a list of diseases or problems- sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), maternal mortality or from a list of programs like maternal and child health, safe motherhood, and family planning. Reproductive health instead must be understood in the context of relationships like fulfillment and risk, the opportunity to have a desired child or alternatively to avoid unwanted or unsafe pregnancy. This contributes enormously to physical and psychological comfort and closeness and to personal and social maturation or poor reproductive health is frequently associated with disease, abuse, exploitation, unwanted pregnancy and death.

Problems that are specific to women's reproductive process can be divided into two ways. Firstly, problems occurring during pregnancy, delivery, and puerperium are referred to in the medical literature as obstetric (maternal) morbidity. Secondly, problems that occur to non-pregnant women and outside the puerperal period of six weeks are known as gynecological morbidity.

Knowledge on reproductive health
Reproductive health is an important component of general health and it is a pre-requisite for social, economic, and human development. Knowledge on reproductive health such as early and unwanted pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted infects and pregnancy related illness and death account for a significant part of the burden of diseases among adolescent and adults. To improve knowledge on reproductive health, efforts have so far focused on the approaches such as antenatal care, tetanus toxic immunization, iron supplementation, training of traditional birth attendants for clean and safe delivery practices and family planning.


Women in reproductive age
Women can conceive and produce child safely within certain age limits. Usually, it indicates childbearing period or reproductive span of women. Generally, the age from 15 to 49 years is considered as reproductive span for women.

Pregnancy and pregnancy wastage
Pregnancy is the state of female which is produced due to the implantation of the fertilized ovum in the uterine endometrium and ultimately giving rise to a foetus (Jeffcoate, 1975). In an average, duration of pregnancy accepted 280 days from the first day of last menstruation. Pregnancy wastage may be defined as the loss of product of conception normally or therapeutically and can be classified as intra-uterine foetal death, abortion, and menstrual regulation (Jeffcoate, 1975; and Shaw, Soutter and Stanton, 2003). In our study, we have dealt with the normal pregnancy wastages only that are not therapeutically wasted.

Review of Literature
Many researchers have evaluated factors affecting maternal education and reproductive health of women that vary from one geographical area to another. Ardebili, Kamali, Pouranssari, and Komarizadeh (1987) studied the reproductive behavior of 1525 pregnant women at the time of pregnancy termination in relation to maternal age, education, prenatal care, and number of previous pregnancies. The results showed that the frequency of maternal attendance at prenatal care centers was significantly related to maternal education and that total pregnancies or woman is inversely correlated with maternal education. The type of pregnancy termination which resulted in live birth or abortion has significant relation to the age of mother. Again, the highest percentage of abortion was observed in (15-19) age group and the highest number of natural deliveries was observed in the age group (20-29).

Govindasamy and Ramesh (1997) used Indian's National Family Health Survey (1992-93) data and showed that there is a consistently strong association between maternal health care utilization and mother's education. In the country as a whole, only half of births to illiterate women received antenatal care compared to 79% of births to literate women with less than middle school education and more than 90% of births to women with at least middle school education. Only 12% of births to illiterate women are delivered in institutions compared with 67% of births to women with at least a middle school education. Similarly, only one-fifth of births to illiterate women are attended by a health professional where as three-fourth of births to women with at least a middle school education.

Mothers in third world countries with their limited resources and cultural background, rarely give priority to their health problems except where there is a life threatening danger (Bhatia and Cleland, 1995). Hence it is not surprising that such women are also reluctant to admit having health problems or hesitate to seek medical help, especially if ailment is related to reproductive health (Bang et al, 1989). Shidhu and Shidhu (1988) studied the case of pregnancy wastage in scheduled caste women of Punjab and identified some causes of more pregnancy wastage. Besides these, Banerjee and Hazra (2004) investigated some socio-economic determinants of pregnancy wastage. But no such elaborate works have been conducted in Bangladesh.

Although reproductive health and knowledge on it is a vital issue by United Nations and in every country world wide, there have been some efforts to do the same in Bangladesh. Ashraf et al (2001) showed that 90% of the rural and urban women had the knowledge about menstrual hygiene, need of antenatal care visits, and immunization during pregnancy. But 55% of women were not aware of complications associated with pregnancy and post-delivery with a notable difference between rural and urban areas. Surprisingly, 68% of the women in both rural and urban areas had knowledge about delivery related complications.

Khanum et al. (2000) explained the complications of pregnancy and childbirth regarding the knowledge and practices of women in Rural Bangladesh. Women's knowledge on symptoms of complications relating to pregnancy, delivery, and after-delivery was found to be high in Abhoynagar Thana in Mirsarai. More than 60% of them had knowledge of severe vomiting as a complication during pregnancy in both the areas. Nearly half of the Abhoynagar women and one-third in Mirsarai were aware of severe bleeding as a post-delivery complication. More than two-fifth (42.5%) of the women of Abhoynagar and 30.7% women of Mirsarai mentioned oedema as a danger sign of pregnancy.

Bangladesh has among the lowest indicators of use of maternal health care services in the world. Recently around 67% of all pregnant women had no antenatal check-up throughout their whole pregnancy, around 92% of deliveries occur at home and approximately 87% of deliveries occur without the presence of a skilled attendant (ICDDR, B, 2003). Less than one-half of pregnant women obtain antenatal care and almost all births (91%) occur at home, generally with an unskilled attendant (BMSS, 2002 and BDHS, 2000). Limited access to essential obstetric contributes to high maternal mortality and has been estimated to be 320 to 400 per 100,000 live births (BMMS, 2002). Thus no clear policies have been formulated towards ensuring basic obstetric care at the community level. But the regional study of these factors is really shaky. A study on Tangail and Noakhali district confirmed only on some indicators like total population, crude birth rate, expected number of deliveries, life saving obstetric surgery and unmet need only. But no such study has been conducted in the district of Rajshahi in Bangladesh. From the above review, it is obvious that there are many scopes of conducting research. To our knowledge, no work has been done yet in Rajshahi district regarding different factors like reproductive knowledge, pregnancy wastage, delivery status, acceptance of family planning and their impacts on each other.

In this paper an attempt has been made to investigate the impact of reproductive knowledge, acceptance of family planning, birth spacing, number of live birth, age, education, and occupation of mother on pregnancy wastage.

 

DATA AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

Data
The data were collected from a field survey conducted in the rural area of the district of Rajshahi in Bangladesh. We selected Baksimoil Union of Mohanpur Thana as a representative part of Rural Rajshahi. We have collected information from 1500 mothers by preparing a questionnaire.

Analytical Methods
In our study we have used mainly the tabular system of data, and rating the knowledge on reproductive behavior. We have also used the linear probability models to predict the pregnancy wastage and to identify the impact of some most influential variables.

Linear probability model
Let us consider a simple model



where X is the reproductive knowledge rate, Y = 1 when pregnancy wastage occurs, and Y = 0 when there depicts no pregnancy wastage.

This model expresses the dichotomous Yi as a linear function of the explanatory variables Xi and is called linear probability model. Now the conditional expectation ofYi given Xi can be interpreted as the conditional probability that the event will occur given Xi, that is, . Thus gives the probability of pregnancy wastage whose reproductive knowledge is rated as Xi (Gujarati, 1995).

Assuming to find an unbiased estimator we obtain . Now letting Pi probability that Yi = 1 (the event occurs) and 1-Pi probability that Yi = 0 (the event does not occur), the variable has the following distribution:



Now by the definition of mathematical expectation we obtain . Thus we can write the conditional expectation as probability, that is, . Since the probabilityPi must lie between 0 and 1, we have the restriction , that is, the conditional expectation or conditional probability must lie between 0 and 1.

The general expression of the linear probability model (LPM) is

where, Y equal to 1 or 0 according as pregnancy wastage occurs or not, Xi and 's are explanatory variables like reproductive knowledge rating, acceptance of family planning, birth spacing, total number of live birth, age of respondent, and other relevant factors.

Reproductive knowledge rating
We have collected some reproductive knowledge (opinion) related information like risk of pregnancy before 18 years, taking iron tablets during pregnancy, vitamins before and after birth, T.T. injection during pregnancy, medical check-up, understand pregnancy complications, need of safe birth attendant, and birth spacing. Assuming these eight factors have uniform weight we have scored on knowledge for every factor. We rated for each factor such that if one had knowledge about a factor and she did according her knowledge then we had rated her knowledge as 1/8=0.15 for that factor and 0 otherwise. For example, if a respondent replies that she has taken T.T. injection during pregnancy (obviously she knows it) then we have rated her knowledge 0.15 for this factor. Finally we have summed the scores of all eight factors to obtain the rate of knowledge that is then termed as reproductive knowledge rate. If a respondent bears knowledge on each of these eight factors in mind then she is termed to have perfect knowledge of reproductive behavior. Thus this knowledge rating ranges between 0 and 1.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Some basic characteristics of the study population have been incorporated in Table 1. We observe that the highest number of respondents is aged between 25-29 years and the lowest number of respondents is aged between 45 to 49 years. By the constitutional law of Bangladesh the minimum age at first marriage for women is 18 years and in an average first age at marriage is found 20.44 years and 21.4 years in urban and rural areas, respectively (SVRS, 2002). But in our study area early marriage is most frequent and more than 90% respondents get married before their early eighteens. This clearly depicts that the female populations in that study area and their guardians are not aware of the extent of various physical and mental complications for early marriage. The most vulnerable sight of this early marriage is that the mean age at marriage of the study population is only 16.8 years.

Age at first birth is also a measure of proper reproductive behavior. In Bangladesh average age at first birth is 19 (BDHS, 2001). But, early pregnancy and early motherhood is commonly observed in our study area. More than 70% of married women gave their first birth before reaching 20 years of age. The tendency of early motherhood is so high that the mean age at first birth is only 18.7 years, that is, most of the mothers are in high risk with respect to their proper physical growth of being pregnant.

Gender equity is acceptable worldwide. Many government and non-government organizations are working for establishing gender equality over the country and are encouraging women to work with their male counterpart. However, around 98% of married women in this area are house keeper. Although the Government of Bangladesh launched two-child program several years (nearly 25 years) ago in 1980, around one-fourth respondents have more than two children, that is, the effect of family planning services is very slow here.

Two consecutive births within 24 months (2 years) are very risky for mother's health. However, 15% mothers gave their last birth before two years from their previous birth. Only 44% of mothers in this area maintained proper child spacing. Surprisingly enough that very limited number of respondent bear knowledge on healthy reproductive behavior. Most of the females in this study area are not aware of their reproductive health. The most perilous deed is that mean reproductive knowledge rating is only 0.45 that covers the 45% of most influential knowledge of reproductive behavior.

Education is the single most factors that accumulate knowledge on social as well as reproductive behavior. Illiteracy is common here and around one-third respondent and their husbands are illiterate. Only one-third of our study population with their husband studied at primary level only. Lack of much formal education may cause such fall in reproductive knowledge rating.

Further, the proportions of pregnancy wastage to mother have been computed just dividing the number of pregnancy wastage in a certain age group by the number of women in that age group. The proportion of pregnancy wastage to mother depicts that pregnancy wastage is higher for below 20 age groups and above 35 age groups (Fig.1). Pregnancy wastage may be a result of many causes. But we have counted only unintentional pregnancy wastages.


Fig 1. Age-specific propotion of pregnancy wasteage to mother

Click here for Table 1: Characteristics of study population

Now we fit linear probability model using occurrence and non-occurrence of pregnancy wastage as the dependant variable. We have dealt with several explanatory variables like reproductive knowledge rating, acceptance of family planning, total number of live birth, age, working status and education level of respondent. We found that only reproductive knowledge rating, acceptance of family planning, and numbers of live children were significantly affecting the pregnancy wastage. However age, working status and education level showed no significant effect on pregnancy wastage. Thus our fitted linear probability model includes only those significant factors and can be expressed as



where X1 represents reproductive knowledge rating (continuous variable), X2 = 0 when number of children is less than or equal to two and X2 = 1when the number of children is more than two, and X3 = 0 when the respondent accepts family planning and X3 = 1when she does not accept it. The dichotomous dependent variableYi is such that when there depicts no pregnancy wastage then Yi = 0 and when there occurs any pregnancy wastage then Yi = 1.

We observe that increase in reproductive knowledge and acceptance of family planning (contraception) substantially decreases the risk of pregnancy wastage. But the increased number of living child as well as increased number of birth increases the risk of pregnancy wastage. We can also explain theses feature that with the 10%, 20%, and 30% increase in reproductive knowledge rates the risk of pregnancy wastage is decreased by 4.57%, 9.14%, and 13.71%, respectively subject to the condition that all other factors in the model are fixed at certain level.


CONCLUDING REMARKS

Now we fit linear probability model using occurrence and non-occurrence of pregnancy wastage as the dependant variable. We have dealt with several explanatory variables like reproductive knowledge rating, acceptance of family planning, total number of live birth, age, working status and education level of respondent. We found that only reproductive knowledge rating, acceptance of family planning, and numbers of live children were significantly affecting the pregnancy wastage. However age, working status and education level showed no significant effect on pregnancy wastage. Thus our fitted linear probability model includes only those significant factors and can be expressed as

where represents reproductive knowledge rating (continuous variable), when number of children is less than or equal to two and when the number of children is more than two, and when the respondent accepts family planning and when she does not accept it. The dichotomous dependent variable is such that when there depicts no pregnancy wastage then and when there occurs any pregnancy wastage then

We observe that increase in reproductive knowledge and acceptance of family planning (contraception) substantially decreases the risk of pregnancy wastage. But the increased number of living child as well as increased number of birth increases the risk of pregnancy wastage. We can also explain theses feature that with the 10%, 20%, and 30% increase in reproductive knowledge rates the risk of pregnancy wastage is decreased by 4.57%, 9.14%, and 13.71%, respectively subject to the condition that all other factors in the model are fixed at certain level.


REFERENCES

  1. Ashraf A, Hasan Y, Reza M, Saha NC, and Khuda B: Knowledge of Men about Reproductive Health Issues and Services in Bangladesh, Operation Research Project, ICDDR,B, Working Paper No. 135, 2000.
  2. Ardebili HE, Kamali P, Pouranssari Z, Komarizadeh A: Prenatal care and maternal age, education and reproductive behaviour, Iran J Public Health. 1987;16(1-4):57-64.
  3. Banerjee B, Hazra S: Socio-demographic Determinants of Pregnancy Wastage, J Obstet Gynecol Ind, Vol.54, No. 4: July / Aug 2004: 355-360.
  4. Bang RA, Bang A, Baitule M, Chaudhury Y, Sarmukaddam S and Tale O:High prevalence of gynecological diseases in rural Indian women. Lancet 1 (8629): 85- 88; 1989.
  5. BDHS: Bangladesh Demography and Health Survey, 2000.
  6. Bhatia JC and Cleland J: Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India. Health Transition Review, 1995, 5(2):127-142.
  7. Bhatia JC and Cleland J: Self Reported Symptoms and Gynecological Morbidity
    and their Treatment in South India. Studies in Family Planning. 1995, 26 (4): 203-210.
  8. BMMS: Bangladesh Maternal Mortality Survey, 2002.
  9. De Silva WI: Symptoms of Ill Health and Health Seeking Behavior of Sri Lankan Mothers during the Puerperium: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 1998.
  10. Govindasamy P and Ramesh BM: Maternal Education and the Utilization of Maternal and Child Health Services in India, National Family Health Survey, Subject Report No. 5, 1997.
  11. Gujarati D N: Basic Econometrics, 3 rd ed., McGraw Hill, Singapore, 1995.
  12. ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research, Annual Report, 2003.
  13. Jeffcoate SN: Principles of Gynaecology, 4th ed., Butterworths World Student Reprints, Boston, 1975.
  14. Khanum PA, Quaiyum MA, Islam A, and Ahmed S: Complications of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Knowledge and Practices of Women in Rural Bangladesh, Operation Research Project, ICDDR,B, Working Paper No. 131, 2000.
  15. Sidhu S, Sidhu LS: Pregnancy wastage in scheduled caste women of Punjab, Ann Hum Biol., 1988 Mar-Apr;15(2):167-70.
  16. Shaw RW, Soutter WP, Stanton SL: Gynaecology, 3rd ed, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2003.
  17. WHO: World health Organization, Geneva, 2004.
.................................................................................................................
 

I About MEJFM I Journal I Advertising I Author Info I Editorial Board I Resources I Contact us I Journal Archive I MEPRCN I Noticeboard I News and Updates
Disclaimer - ISSN 148-4196 - © Copyright 2007 medi+WORLD International Pty. Ltd. - All rights reserved