JOURNAL
Current Issue
Journal Archive
...........................................
July 2009 - Volume 7, Issue 6
Download print-friendly version (1.09MB)
........................................................
From the Editor
........................................................
Original Contributon and Clinical Investigation

Diabetes and Vaccination
Selcuk Mistik, Dilek Toprak, Abdullah Ozkiris, Hasan Basri Ustunbas

The Effect of the Diabetic Centers on the Outcome of Saudi Patients with Diabetic Foot Problems Attending Gurayat General Hospital
Dr. Almoutaz Alkhier Ahmed
Awareness Regarding Self Care among Diabetics in Rural India
Dr J P, Majra, Dr. Das Acharya
........................................................
Review Articles
Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Aden Governorate
Abdullah Mohamed Ahmed, Salem Bin Selm
Diabetic Foot: Off Loading Devices
Dr.Almoutaz Alkhier Ahmed
Emerging Challenges of Diabetes
Abdulrahman Al-Ajlan
Review on the Prevalence of Diabetic Foot and Its Risk Factors in Saudi Arabia
Almoutaz Alkhier Ahmed
........................................................
Medicine and Society
A Warm Welcome to The International Independent Medical Index
Dr. Mohsen Rezaeian
Can Diabetic Patients Fast During Ramadan?
Dr. Yousef Abdullah Al Turki
Call for Papers from the South Asia Region - A Move to Expand the Journal to Meet the Needs of All Global Family Doctors
........................................................

Chief Editor -
Abdulrazak Abyad MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE

.........................................................

Publisher -
Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
572 Burwood Road,
Hawthorn 3122
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9819 1224
Fax: +61 (3) 9819 3269
Email
: lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

Editorial Enquiries -
abyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................

Advertising Enquiries -
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

While all efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this journal, opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Publishers, Editor or the Editorial Board. The publishers, Editor and Editorial Board cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; or the views and opinions expressed. Publication of any advertisements does not constitute any endorsement by the Publishers and Editors of the product advertised.

The contents of this journal are copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this program may be reproduced without the permission of the publisher.

July 2009 - Volume 7, Issue 6
Awareness Regarding Self Care among Diabetics in Rural India
.........................................................................................................................

1. Dr J P, Majra (Corresponding author)
MD (Community Medicine), MBA (Health Care Services),
Associate Professor,
Dept. of Community Medicine,
K.S.Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore. India. 575018
Tel: 919480287990
e-mail: jpmajra@hotmail.com

2. Dr. Das Acharya,

MD (Community Medicine),
Professor & HOD, Dept. of Community Medicine,
K.S.Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore. India. 575018

ABSTRACT

One of the greatest challenges faced by the modern world is Diabetes mellitus (DM). The physical, social and economic factors involved in the management of diabetes are a continuous strain for the health sector and the government agencies. It is expected that approximately 366 million people will be affected by Diabetes mellitus by the year 2030.
Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic disorders with multiple etiologies characterized by chronic hyperglycemia with disturbance of carbohydrate and fat, resulting from insulin defect in secretion or action.
The new classification of diabetes mellitus given by The Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus in 1997 is universally adopted. Type 1 diabetes appears as a result of autoimmune destruction of beta cells or may be idiopathic. The more common type 2 DM, affecting mostly adults manifests as a result of insulin resistance. The other specific types are impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), gestational diabetes and some genetic defects of Beta cells.
The high risk groups of diabetes are Blacks, Hispanics, Indian Americans, people having a BMI of > 27 kg/m2 ,high BP, high cholesterol and having a first degree relative with DM.
According to the 1998 WHO report normal Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) should be less than 6.1 mmol/l and 2 hour plasma glucose less than 7.8 mmol/l . The FPG above 7.8 mmol/l is diagnostic of Diabetes mellitus. The Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) is one of the best indicators of diabetes.
Obesity and lack of exercise are the most important factors in precipitating diabetes. Regular screening at an early age of individuals with high risk is strongly recommended. Screening for Gestational diabetes should be done at 24 -28 weeks.
General standards for diabetes management and self management education are recommended. Preventing diabetic complications is the objective.
Diabetes poses a great economic burden on government resources. The US alone has spent 91.8 billion $ on Diabetes in 1992, while England spent 113 million pounds the same year. The Middle East region spent almost 5.2 billion ID in 2003 on diabetes alone. Pakistan, a developing country spent 800 million ID. Saudi Arabia's expenditure on diabetes is estimated to be around 1142 ID. According to WHO records almost one Saudi diabetic patient costs $ 800 per month
Key words: Classification of Diabetes, Criteria of Diabetes, Obesity, Diabetes cast.



INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is a disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality1,2. Patients with diabetes have higher rates of coronary artery disease, retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy1. Many of these complications can be prevented with appropriate medical care3,4. This care, however, in addition to taking medications by the patient, often requires significant alterations in lifestyle, (increasing exercise and changing the type of food one eats) and strict adherence to self-care tasks, such as checking urine/blood sugars, to obtain good control of the disease5. The importance of self-management skills in diabetes care has also been stressed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Patient education has been proven to be an important method of management of such a community health problem6. This study was carried out to assess the level of awareness about the disease and self-care methods and to identify any patient specific characteristics associated with this knowledge. We hope it will form the basis for further research in the future to develop educational strategies to improve patients' self-management skills and hence help to better control the disease.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out on the diabetic patients attending the out patient clinic at three randomly selected rural primary health centers i.e. PHC Natekal, PHC Boliar, and PHC Amblamogaru in Dakshina Kannada District of Karnataka state in India in 2007. The following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients with disease duration of less than two years; 2) patients below 18 years of age (still dependent on parents); and 3) patients above 80 years (as they could have senile forgetfulness dementia, etc.). All diabetic patients visiting these clinics except the above were selected for the study. Patients were interviewed by MBBS interns posted at the PHCs by the department of community medicine. The data and responses were recorded on a semi structured pre-tested questionnaire. Patients' level of knowledge was assessed by asking questions on symptoms of hypoglycemia and chronic complications of diabetes. Knowledge about hypoglycemia was considered to be adequate if the patient could correctly recall three of the following hypoglycemic symptoms: sweating, palpitations, hunger, tremor or feeling of impending disaster, each of which can be relieved by taking some food or glucose. Knowledge about chronic complications was assessed and deemed adequate if patients could specify at least three of the following: effect on vision (retinopathy), kidneys (nephropathy), sensation (neuropathy), potency (automatic neuropathy), heart (ischemic heart disease) and on the legs and feet (peripheral vasculopathy)7. Patients' level of self- care was assessed by asking about the following practices carried out at home: 1) urine testing by the dipstick method; 2) blood sugar testing by glucometer, 3) self-injection of insulin; 4) Diet control; 5) Abstinence from alcohol; 6) Abstinence from smoking; 7) Eye care; 8) Foot care; 9) Skin care; 10) Dental care; 11) Regular exercise; 12) Adherence to medication and 13) regular follow up. The responses were recorded as "yes" or "no." All the data were tabulated and analyzed. Chi-squared test was used as a test of significance.


RESULTS

A total of 342 diabetics were studied; 181 (53%) were men and 161 (43%) were women. The majority, 63%, were Hindu, 26% were Christian and 11% were Muslim by faith. The majority 128 (37%) of the respondents were in the age group of 61-70 years, followed by 80 (24%), 68 (20%) and 66 (19%) in the age group of 41-50 years, 51-60 years and >70 years respectively. One hundred and twenty eight (37%) were high school pass followed by 80 (24%) higher primary, 57 (17%) primary, 52 (15%) graduate and 23 (7%) were illiterate. 73% had a per capita monthly income of Rupee 3000 or more.
Table 1 shows that 191 (56%) of the respondents had adequate knowledge about the symptoms of hypoglycemia. Men were found to be more aware than women and this difference was statistically significant. Only 52 (15%) of the respondents knew about the chronic complications of diabetes. Here also men had better knowledge than women but the difference was statistically non-significant. Respondents with per capita income of rupee two thousand or more and having ten or more years of schooling were more aware regarding the disease and its chronic complications. No difference in the awareness was observed across various religious groups.
Table 2 shows the awareness and practices regarding self care among the diabetics. All the 342 respondents were aware regarding diet control but only 148(43%) followed the recommended diet schedules. It was observed that more women (52%) than men (32%) followed the recommended diet schedules. Eighty two percent of the respondents were aware that regular physical exercise is helpful but only nine percent of the men and four percent of the women followed this advice. One hundred and forty one (41%) and 124 (36%) of the total 342 respondents had the knowledge that alcohol and cigarette smoking are harmful for diabetics but only 26 (19%) of the alcohol drinkers and 15 (14%) of the smokers stopped using these products on the advice of their doctor after being diagnosed as diabetics. One hundred percent of the diabetics had knowledge regarding self urine examination at regular intervals. Only 121 (35%) were monitoring their urine sugar level regularly. 227 (66%) of respondents were aware regarding self blood sugar examination and just 11 (3%) were monitoring their blood sugar level at home. Despite the fact all respondents were aware that diabetes is not a curable disease so regular follow up is very important, only 168 (48%) were showing compliance to this advice. Knowledge of the respondents regarding eye, foot and skin care was painfully low, only 52 (15%), 57 (17%) and 38 (11%) of respondents respectively were aware of these and practice was lower still. A minimum 23 (7%) of the diabetics had knowledge regarding dental care and 11 (3%) were visiting a dentist regularly. People across religions had similar levels of knowledge and practice. People with per capita income of less than two thousand rupee and schooling less than ten years had lower knowledge. It was further observed that respondents with a longer duration of disease had a wrong perception that they knew more about the disease and its care, but study found no such difference. No difference was observed across PHCs under study.

Table 1 Level of knowledge in diabetics about the disease

Patient Data
Hypoglycemic symptom awareness Chronic complications awareness
Sex No. Yes (%) No (%) Yes (%) No (%)
Men 181 118 (65) 63 (35) 35 (19) 146 (81)
Women 161 73 (45) 88 (55) 21 (13) 140 (87)
Total 342 191 (56) 151 (44) 56 (16) 286 (84)
P value 0.001 (significant) 0.10 (non-significant)

 

Table 2 Level of self care among diabetics
Activity Number of aware persons Number practicing
Men
n= 181
Women n= 161 Total
n= 342
Men n= 181 Women n= 161 Total
n= 342
Diet control 181(100) 161(100) 342(100) 64(35) 84(52) 148(43)
Regular exercise 155(86) 124(77) 279(82) 17(9) 06(4) 23(7)
Abstinence from alcohol 95(53) 46(29) 141(41) 26( 19) NA 26*(19)
Abstinence from smoking 92(51) 32(20) 124(36) 15(14) NA 15#(14)
Self urine examination 181(100) 161(100) 342(100) 64(35) 57(35) 121(35)
Self blood examination 143(79) 84(52) 227(66) 7(4) 4(3) 11(3)
Adherence to medication 181(100) 161(100) 342(100) 169(93) 150(93) 319(93)
Self administration of insulin 3(100) NA 3(100) 3(100) NA 3(100)
Regular follow up 181(100) 161(100) 342(100) 87(48) 76(47) 163(48)
Eye care 33(18) 19(12) 52(15) 14(8) 9(6) 23(7)
Foot care 35(19) 22(14) 57(17) 16(9) 19(12) 46(14)
Skin care 28(16) 16(10) 38(11) 18(10) 16(10) 34(10)
Dental care 14(8) 9(6) 23(7) 7(4) 4(3) 11(32)

- None among the female respondents were using alcohol or tobacco and none was on insulin.
- Out of total 135 persons taking alcohol only 65 were aware and 26 quit after the disease.
- Out of total 104 smokers only 45 were aware and 15 quit after the disease.

DISCUSSION

Diabetes is a disease requiring many types of interventions to prevent the associated morbidity and mortality, which also involves self-care practices that the patient can complete independently. The importance of self-management skills in diabetes care has been stressed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Self care is a crucial element in secondary prevention of diabetes. It requires that the diabetic should take a major responsibility for his/her own care with medical guidance e.g. adherence to diet and drug regimens, home monitoring of urine and blood glucose, self administration of insulin, maintenance of optimum weight, abstinence from tobacco and alcohol, recognition of symptoms associated with glycosuria and hypoglycemia and attending periodic check ups. In order to meet this requirement the diabetic has to make very important and crucial decisions daily. Therefore she/he must have a working knowledge of the disease. The present study has shown that diabetics in the area under study had a poor level of knowledge about the disease and self-care. Similar observations have been made elsewhere also7,8,9. It was further observed that the attitude of the diabetics in the area under study, towards the disease, was very casual and only a few of them had put their knowledge into practice. Ruggiero et al, in a nationwide survey of individuals with diabetes, found that over 90% reported always or usually taking their medication but only 64% always or usually followed dietary recommendations and less than half always or usually exercised10. Additionally, medical regimens used to treat chronic disease are complicated. Patients may not fully understand the medical rationale behind particular recommendations such as exercise and diet. Furthermore, exercise and diet may not result in immediate improvement in symptoms and often cause initial discomfort or feelings of deprivation, thereby providing little positive feedback and reinforcement. Information provided by home monitoring of blood glucose and urine testing for glucose is a powerful motivating factor11, encouraging self management of the diabetes by allowing the patient to measure directly the impact of their behaviour, such as the effect of eating on postprandial glucose, or glucose lowering effect of exercise. Some studies have shown that even in patients treated with diet alone, those who measure their blood glucose more often have better outcomes and those who are highly motivated are likely to do well in the long term12,13. Under such circumstances health education is an area which needs to be addressed immediately14. Diabetes mellitus has been cited as a model disease in which patient education makes a big difference15. Regular assessment of patients' skills and knowledge is critical16,17. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that patients' knowledge of the self-care responsibility be assessed annually and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) recommends reassessing patient knowledge about diabetes at least three months after an educational intervention18,19. This assessment can be easily made by administering a written or oral evaluation with each outpatient visit. Improving patients' knowledge of diabetes self-care practices will allow them to better contribute to their care thereby postponing, if not avoiding, long-term complications. It will be a small investment with a large benefit.

 

CONCLUSION

Self care is a crucial element in secondary prevention of diabetes. Diabetics had a poor level of knowledge about the disease and self-care and hence a very casual attitude towards the disease. This predisposes them to the risk of development of complications in later life. Health education is an area which needs to be addressed immediately to improve patients' knowledge and skills of diabetes self-care practices so that they can better contribute towards the management of their disease.


REFERENCES

  1. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America. 2nd edition. Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 1995.
  2. Saydah SH, Eberhardt MS, Loria CM, Brancati FL. Age and the burden of death attributable to diabetes in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:714-719. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf111. [PubMed].
  3. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Bmj. 1998;317:703-713. [PubMed].
  4. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837-853. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6. [PubMed].
  5. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;2:S33-50. [PubMed].
  6. Hassan TA. The centrality of the patient's role in the management of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J 1998;19:370-5.
  7. Elzubier AG, Al-Amri ADA, Al-Haraka EA, Abu-Samara IO. Self-care, self-reliance and knowledge of diabetes among diabetics in Al-Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 1996;17:598-603.
  8. Hsing-Yi Chang, Chii-Jun Chiou, Ming-Chu Lin, Shu-Hui Lin, Tong-Yuan Tai. A population study of the self-care behaviors and their associated factors of diabetes in Taiwan. Preventive Medicine 2005;40:3:344-8.
  9. Binhemd TA. Diabetes mellitus. Knowledge, attitude, practice and their relation to diabetes control in female diabetics. Ann Saudi Med 1992;12:247-51.
  10. Ruggiero L, Glasgow R, Dryfoos JM, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO, Orleans CT, Prokhorov AV, Rossi SR, Greene GW, Reed GR, Kelly K, Chobanian L, Johnson S. Diabetes self-management. Self-reported recommendations and patterns in a large population. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20:568-576.
  11. Alberti KG, Gries FA, Jervell J, Krans HM. A desktop guide for the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitis: an update. European NIDDM Policy Group. Diabet Med 1994;11:899-909.
  12. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D'Agostino RB, Jr., Ferrara A, Liu j, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanete Diabetes Registry. Am J Med 2001;111:1-9.
  13. Martin S, Schneider B, Heiemann L, Lodwing V, Kurth HJ, Kolb H, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glucose in type 2 diabetes and long term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study. Diabetologia 2006;49:271-8.
  14. El-Hazmi MAF, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, Al-Sudairy F, Sulaimani R, Al-Swailem AM, et al. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the population of Riyadh. Ann Saudi Med 1995;15:598-601.
  15. Strowig S. Patient education: a model for autonomous decision-making and deliberate action in diabetes self-management. Med Clin North Am 1982;66:1293-307.
  16. American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2000. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(suppl 1):S1-116.
  17. Diabetes Mellitus Working Group. Veterans Health Administration clinical guidelines for management of diabetes mellitus. Version 4.0. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration; 1997.
  18. Brown SA. Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: a meta-analysis revisited. Patient Educ Couns. 1990; 16:189-215.
  19. Padgett D, Mumford E, Hynes M et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and pyschosocial interventions on management of diabetes mellitus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 41:1007-30.
.................................................................................................................
 

I About MEJFM I Journal I Advertising I Author Info I Editorial Board I Resources I Contact us I Journal Archive I MEPRCN I Noticeboard I News and Updates
Disclaimer - ISSN 148-4196 - © Copyright 2007 medi+WORLD International Pty. Ltd. - All rights reserved