When
to Label White-Coat Syndrome
.........................................................................................................................
Adnan Moh`d Ammoura MD
Family practitioner, Jordanian Board
Flight Surgeon, Dip.Av.Med, Royal college of
physicians, London
Nashat Halasah MD
Internal Medicine, Jordanian Board
Royal Jordanian Air Force Medical Services
Amman - Jordan
Correspondence:
Dr. Adnan Moh`d Ammoura
P.O. Box 410352
Amman - 11141 - JORDAN
Tel: 962-79-6404848
Fax: 962-6-5231599
Email: AdnanAmm@hotmail.com
|
ABSTRACT
Studies
suggest that about 10% of patients may
experience white-coat syndrome. The cause
of the syndrome is unclear but may be
a conditioning phenomenon.
This
study was conducted on 240 patients recorded
in the family practice clinic, in the
Royal Jordanian Air Force medical facility.
Patients were selected according to the
discordance in blood pressure readings
(by doctor, nurse and home measurements),
during a period of three years (January
2000- January 2003), and numbered 220
males and 20 females, aged 30-60 years,
with mean age of the patients (42.3).
It was conceived to evaluate the management
of White coat syndrome patients.
In our study, we
referred all patients to King Hussein
Medical Center for cardiac consultation
to confirm the white-coat syndrome, by
using a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure
monitor.
Out of 240 patients,
60 patients were labeled hypertensive
(25%) of cases, the rest of the patients
were kept on follow up as white coat syndrome;
(16.7%) of the cases were found to have
bad blood pressure monitors at home.
The best way to diagnose hypertension
when in doubt with white coat syndrome
, is accomplished by using a 24-hour ambulatory
blood pressure monitor.
Keywords: Hypertension,
White coat syndrome, Ambulatory monitoring.
|
White coat syndrome (hypertension)
refers to individuals showing a rise in blood
pressure to a hypertensive level when measured
by physicians, but remains normal when measured
by the nurses or at home(1). The
cause and clinical implications of the white
coat syndrome are unclear and the subject of
an ongoing debate(2). Anxiety of
early visits to the physician's office is "learned"
and subconsciously repeated during subsequent
visits. Studies suggest that for patients with
white coat hypertension, the heart disease risk
is between that of patients with true hypertension
and patients with normal blood pressure(3).
That is, cardiovascular risk is increased, but
is not as high as someone with sustained hypertension.
The white coat effect is
important in diagnosing and assessing control
of hypertension in primary care(4).
This is best accomplished by using ambulatory
blood pressure monitoring(5), which
will periodically measure and record the blood
pressure outside the physician's office. If
the blood pressure is normal in this ambulatory
assessment, it would be consistent with white
coat syndrome. Also, we must ask the patients
to check their home blood pressure monitor.
If it is accurate, it could be used to document
out-of-office blood pressure levels. If white-coat
hypertension is confirmed, we generally rely
on the home assessments to guide therapy.
There is no evidence that
treating patients with white coat syndrome increases
risk, but this possibility has not been studied
at length. Initiation and maintenance of treatment
for white coat syndrome represents an enormous
opportunity and cost for health professionals
and for patients, in addition to the unnecessary
anxiety and side effects(6,7), Also
some of the patients have symptoms of excessively
reduced blood pressure, like light-headedness
when rising from a chair, or unusual fatigue
or tiredness, which necessitates stopping medication.
But according to other studies,
all patients must be monitored because white
coat syndrome has also shown to advance frequently
into sustained hypertension in the future life
of the patient(8).
In the Royal Jordanian Air
Force medical facility, a retrospective study
of the family practitioner clinic records was
done; 240 patients were recorded as having discordance
in blood pressure readings between (physicians,
nurses, and home readings) during a period of
three years (January 2000- January 2003), 220
males and 20 females, aged 30-60 years, mean
age of the patients (42.3).
As a standard definition of white coat syndrome
is lacking, we classed subjects as normotensive
if their blood pressure was <140/90mm Hg
measured by a technician and <160/95 mm Hg
measured by a physician(2,9,10).
These cut off values were taken according to
WHO criteria for normotension, borderline hypertension,
and sustained hypertension(11). A
case definition was set up for any patient in
whom we found discordance in blood pressure
readings. We asked them to bring their blood
pressure monitors for check-up, then a one week,
twice daily, follow up of blood pressure readings
was undertaken (by physicians, nurses, home
monitors). After analyzing data, all patients
were referred to King Hussein Medical Center
for cardiac consultation and ambulatory blood
pressure monitoring.
All patients were detected, diagnosed, and
managed in the family practice clinic, in the
Royal Jordanian Air Force Medical Center. Out
of 48,000 patients seen in the family practice
clinic in the period of one year, 240 patients
(0.5%) were found to have white coat syndrome.
|
Table 1: Distribution
of cases according to age |
|
Age |
30-40 |
41-50 |
51-60 |
|
No. |
9 |
11 |
4 |
|
% |
37.5 |
45.8 |
16.7 |
Table 1 Shows that the highest number of patients
was in age group (41-50) years, accounting for
45.8% of the cases; however the lowest number
was among age group (51-60) years, because the
majority of our patients are on duty air force
personnel.
|
Table 2: Distribution
of cases according to gender |
| |
Male |
Female |
|
No. |
22 |
2 |
|
% |
91.7 |
8.3 |
Male patients were 91.7% of cases while females
8.3%, due to the constitutional nature of the
air force personnel, as shown in Table 2.
|
Table 3: Distribution
of cases according to the cause for measuring
blood pressure |
|
|
Annual medical |
Symptoms of hypertension |
Other disease |
|
No. |
12 |
7 |
5 |
|
% |
50 |
29.2 |
20.8 |
Table 3 shows that the majority of cases were
discovered during a routine annual medical checkup
- 50%, while 20.8% of cases were found to have
high blood pressure readings incidentally during
a physical examination for other medical problems.
On the other hand only 70 patients were complaining
of symptoms of hypertension.
|
Table 4: Distribution
of cases after investigation. |
|
|
Hypertensive
|
White coat syndrome
|
|
No.
|
6
|
18
|
|
%
|
25
|
75
|
Table 4 demonstrates that after investigations,
and using the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure
monitor, 75% of the cases were labeled as white
coat syndrome patients, only 60 patients were
labeled hypertensive. False low blood pressure
readings due to bad blood pressure monitors
at home, was the cause in 40 cases.
Hypertension is perhaps
the most common reason for initiation of lifelong
drug treatment and ongoing management by doctors,
because hypertension results in secondary organ
damage and reduced life span, it should be evaluated
fully and when appropriate treated(12).
In order to establish the diagnosis of hypertension,
it is necessary to document in the course of
several examinations that the arterial blood
pressure remains elevated(12). In
our study we allowed one week of repeated measurement
of blood pressure to establish the diagnosis
of hypertension versus white coat syndrome.
Many definitions of the white coat syndrome
exist(1,2,13), but we worked out
our patients according to the definition used
by many other studies(3,9,10), based
on WHO criteria(11).
The prevalence of white coat syndrome in our
study was 0.5% which is low in comparison with
other studies where it was about 10%(3).
This may be due to the group quality in our
study (young, healthy, air force personnel),
while M. Matangi et al, found that the prevalence
of white coat syndrome is 4.7% in patients referred
for specific blood pressure problems(13).
In our study we detected 40 devices used by
patients for home blood pressure measurement,
with false readings, while many devices have
failed to meet minimum standers for accuracy
and reproducibility in other studies(14).
In other studies, home measurement at the moment
is less reliable but is easier and cheaper(15).
We found that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
was the best way to establish the diagnosis,
as also found in other studies(3,4,5,15).
In our study, after cardiological consultation,
no cardiac involvement was detected, but in
another study(3) their was an association
between white coat syndrome and an increase
in left ventricular mass and an increased prevalence
of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Physicians in primary care clinics must be
aware of the white coat syndrome in the diagnosis
and follow-up of hypertension.
The best way to diagnose hypertension when
in doubt of white coat syndrome, is accomplished
by using a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure
monitor.
- Mancia G, Pevali G, Pomidossi G, et al.
Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure
during measurement by physician and nurse.
Hypertension 1987;9:209-215.
- Mancia G, Zanchetti A. White coat hypertension:
misnomers, misconceptions, and misunderstandings.
What should we do next? J Hypertens 1996;
14:1049-1052.
- Muscholl M.W, Hanse H.W, Bockel U, et al.
Changes in left ventricular structure and
function in patients with white coat hypertension:
cross sectional survey. BMJ, 1998 August 29;
317(7158): 565-570.
- Little P, Barnett J, Bansley L, et al.
Comparison of agreement between measures of
blood pressure in primary care and daytime
ambulatory blood pressure, BMJ 2002 August
3; 325(7358): 258- 263.
- Pickering T.G. Ambulatory blood pressure
monitoring. Curr hypertens Rep 2002; 2: 558-564.
- Marteau T. Reducing the psychological costs.
BMJ 1991; 301: 26-28.
- Medical Research Council Working Party
on Mild Hypertension. Adverse reaction to
propranolol and bendrofluazide for the treatment
of mild hypertension. Lancet 1981; 2: 539-543.
- Bidlingmeyer I, Burnier M, Bindlingmeyer
M, et al. Isolated office hypertension: a
prehypertensive state? J Hypertens 1996; 327-32.
- Cavallini M.C, Roman M, Pickering T, et
al. Is white coat hypertension associated
with arterial disease or left ventricular
hypertrophy? Hypertension 1995;26: 413- 419.
- Kuwajima I, Suzuki Y, Fujisawa A, Kuramoto
K. Is white coat hypertension innocent? Structure
and function of the heart in the elderly.
Hypertension 1993; 22: 826-831.
- Primary prevention of essential hypertension.
Report of the World Health Organization Scientific
Group. Geneva: WHO technical report 1983:
686.
- Petersdorf R.G, Adams R.D, Braunwald E,
et al. Harrisons principles of internal medicine,
tenth edition, McGraw-hill book company-Japan.
1983; chap 29:174-176.
- Matangi M, Angus D, Brouillard D. White
coat systolic hypertension. Definition and
prevalence by 24hr ambulatory blood pressure
monitoring. Kingston Heart clinic Kingston,
Ontario. Canadian cardiovascular congress
2001.
- O'Brien E, Waeber B, Gianfranco P, et al,
on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension
Working Group on Blood pressure Monitoring.
Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations
of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ
2001; 322:531-536.
- Aylett M.J. Ambulatory or self blood pressure
measurement? Improving the diagnosis of hypertension.
Oxford University press, Jou. Fam. Pract.
1994 11: 197-200.
|