JOURNAL
Current Issue
Journal Archive
...........................................
August 2008 - Volume 6 Issue 6
Download print-friendly version (639kb)
...........................................
From the Editor
........................................................
Original Contributon and Clinical Investigation

Pattern of congenital heart disease at Prince Hashim Hospital-Jordan
Khaled Amer

Prevalence of Contraceptive Use in Naogaon District of Bangladesh
Tanvir Hossain, Sumaiya Abedin and Md. Rafiqul Islam
........................................................
Medicine and Society
Tobacco Control in Qatar
Mohamed Ghaith AL-Kuwari
War is an unjustifiable man-made disaster within the Eastern Mediterranean Region
Dr. Mohsen Rezaeian
........................................................

Education and Training

Nepal's General Practitioners - Factors in Their Location of Work
BW Hayes, K Butterworth, B Neupane
........................................................
Clinical Research and Methods
Frequency of Causes Peculiar to Secondary Hypertension in A Tertiary Care Hospital Of Peshawar
Dr Hamzullah Khan
........................................................
Case Report
Appendiceal duplication
Dr. Mohammed Nayef Al-Bdou, Dr. Mohammed Ahmed Rashaideh, Dr. Malek Abdelkareem Alkasasbeh, Dr.Jameel Sa'ud Shawaqfeh
........................................................

Chief Editor -
Abdulrazak Abyad MD, MPH, MBA, AGSF, AFCHSE

.........................................................

Publisher -
Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
572 Burwood Road,
Hawthorn 3122
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9819 1224
Fax: +61 (3) 9819 3269
Email
: lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

Editorial Enquiries -
abyad@cyberia.net.lb
.........................................................

Advertising Enquiries -
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
.........................................................

While all efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this journal, opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Publishers, Editor or the Editorial Board. The publishers, Editor and Editorial Board cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; or the views and opinions expressed. Publication of any advertisements does not constitute any endorsement by the Publishers and Editors of the product advertised.

The contents of this journal are copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this program may be reproduced without the permission of the publisher.

August 2008 - Volume 6, Issue 6
Appendiceal Duplication - A Rrare Condition with Serious Clinical and Medico Legal Implications - Case report

.........................................................................................................................

Dr. Mohammed Nayef Al-Bdour, MD, JBS
Dr. Mohammed Ahmed Rashaideh, MD, JBS
Dr. Malek Abdelkareem Alkasasbeh, MD, JBS
Dr.Jameel Sa'ud Shawaqfeh, MD, JBR


Correspondence to:
Dr. Mohammed Al-Bdour, MD, JBS
Department of Surgery, KHH, Royal medical services, Amman, Jordan
Po. Box 825, Jubiha 11941, Amman, Jordan
Mbdooor@yahoo.com


 

ABSTRACT

Appendicectomy is usually left for junior surgical resident to perform. Though rare, a greater awareness of this entity among junior surgical residents is essential.

A review of the literature, with discussion about the different forms of appendiceal duplication, with concentration on clinical and medico legal significance of this finding.

We present a case of appendiceal duplication, discovered incidentally intraoperatively.
A 20-year old male patient was admitted to the surgical ward in our military field hospital in Iraq, with symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis. Intraoperatively the patient was found to have appendiceal duplication, appendectomy performed successfully, with smooth post operative course.

Key words: appendiceal duplication, vermiform appendix, appendectomy.

 

CASE REPORT:

A twenty -year-old male presented to the emergency room with 48-hour history of per umbilical and right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain, vomiting, and anorexia.

The physical exam was significant for low grade fever, localized RLQ tenderness and guarding. Both rebound and cough signs were positive.

The patient's white blood cell count (WBC) was 15,000, his blood chemistry and urine analysis were within normal. Abdominal ultrasound was reported free.

The patient was admitted and taken to the theatre for appendectomy, intra operative findings were two appendices with two separate bases (figure 1,2,3,4), one of them showed gross signs of inflammation with no evidence of perforation. Appendectomies were performed successfully through grid-iron incision.

The patient had a smooth postoperative course and was discharged home on the third day of admission.

 


DISCUSSIONS

The anomalies of the vermiform appendix are rare; appendiceal duplication is reported with an incidence of 0.004%1

Appendiceal anomalies include anomalous location of a single appendix, horseshoe anomaly of the appendix, agenesis, duplication, and triplication2.
Double appendix is usually asymptomatic, the majority of them are diagnosed at surgery or on postmortem examination, and some of them can be discovered accidentally or preoperatively on barium enema3.

Cave and Wall Bridge have classified the duplication of appendix into three types. A: Partial duplication of the appendix on a single caecum; B: Single caecum with two completely separate appendices; B1: "Bird-like appendix" called so because of its resemblance to the normal arrangement in birds, where there are two appendices symmetrically placed on either side of the ileo-caecal valve; B2: One appendix arises from the usual site on the caecum, with another rudimentary appendix arising from the caecum along the line of one the taenia coli; and C: Two caeca, each bear an appendix. The present case represents Type B1 of appendicular duplication4.

When only one of the double appendixes is inflamed on exploration or laparoscopy appendectomy should be done for both of them so as to avoid diagnostic confusion that may arise on removal of a single appendix5.

 

CONCLUSION

Appendectomy is usually left for junior surgery residents to perform, although congenital anomalies of the vermiform appendix are rare; awareness of them during performance of an operation carries important clinical and medico-legal implications.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Kjossev KT, Losanoff JE. Duplicated vermiform appendix. British Journal of Surgery 1996; 83:1259.
  2. Mesko T. Horseshoe anomaly of the appendix: A previously undescribed entity. Surgery 1989:563-66.
  3. Mitchell IC, Nicholls JC. Duplication of the vermiform appendix. Report of a case: Review of the classification and medico legal aspects. Medicine, Science, Law 1990; 30(2):124-26.
  4. Walbridge PH. Double appendix. Br J Surg 1962; 50:346-7.
  5. Lin BC, Chen RJ, Fang JF, Lo TH, Kuo TT. Duplication of the vermiform appendix. Eur J Surg 1996; 162:589-91.
.................................................................................................................
 

I About MEJFM I Journal I Advertising I Author Info I Editorial Board I Resources I Contact us I Journal Archive I MEPRCN I Noticeboard I News and Updates
Disclaimer - ISSN 148-4196 - © Copyright 2007 medi+WORLD International Pty. Ltd. - All rights reserved